These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19410494)

  • 1. [Essure implants for tubal sterilisation in France].
    Grosdemouge I; Engrand JB; Dhainault C; Marchand F; Martigny H; Thevenot J; Villefranque V; Lopes P; Panel P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 19410494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation.
    Duffy S; Marsh F; Rogerson L; Hudson H; Cooper K; Jack S; Hunter D; Philips G
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1522-8. PubMed ID: 16225573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.
    Sinha D; Kalathy V; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
    BJOG; 2007 Jun; 114(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 17516957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients.
    Panel P; Grosdemouge I
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19022435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnancy after Essure placement: report of two cases.
    Moses AW; Burgis JT; Bacon JL; Risinger J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):724.e9-11. PubMed ID: 17543963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
    Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation.
    Kraemer DF; Yen PY; Nichols M
    Contraception; 2009 Sep; 80(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19698817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Hysteroscopic fallopian tube sterilization procedure: feasibility and one-year follow-up].
    Gibon E; Lopès P; Linet T; Martigny H; Orieux C; Philippe HJ
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Mar; 34(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 16517204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.
    Fernandez H; Legendre G; Blein C; Lamarsalle L; Panel P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 24993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Shade GH; Diamond MP; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18996773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the essure tubal sterilization procedure and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
    Thiel JA; Carson GD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Jul; 30(7):581-585. PubMed ID: 18644179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization with Essure intratubal devices: a case-control prospective with inert local anesthesia or without anesthesia.
    Lopes P; Gibon E; Linet T; Philippe HJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jun; 138(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 17822834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bipolar hysteroscopic procedures and placement of Essure microinserts for tubal sterilization: a case control study.
    Panel P; Grosdemouge I; Houllier M; Renouvel F; Friederich L; Le Tohic A
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2422-5. PubMed ID: 21497338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Placement of the Essure permanent birth control device with fluoroscopic guidance: a novel method for tubal sterilization.
    McSwain H; Shaw C; Hall LD
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Jul; 16(7):1007-12. PubMed ID: 16002509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound: an effective method for localization of the echogenic Essure sterilization micro-insert: correlation with radiologic evaluations.
    Kerin JF; Levy BS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15904599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting.
    Ubeda A; Labastida R; Dexeus S
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):196-9. PubMed ID: 15237011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications of hysteroscopic Essure(®) sterilisation: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single centre.
    Povedano B; Arjona JE; Velasco E; Monserrat JA; Lorente J; Castelo-Branco C
    BJOG; 2012 Jun; 119(7):795-9. PubMed ID: 22360159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of satisfaction after hysteroscopic tubal ligation. About a study from the CHU of Besançon].
    Rufenacht E; Roesch M; Courjon M; Maillet R; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Feb; 43(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 25605508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
    Lannon BM; Lee SY
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.