These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19410504)

  • 1. Effects of attentional filtering demands on preparatory ERPs elicited in a spatial cueing task.
    Seiss E; Driver J; Eimer M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 120(6):1087-95. PubMed ID: 19410504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.
    Couperus JW; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1359():155-77. PubMed ID: 20807513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large lateralized EDAN-like brain potentials in a gaze-shift detection task.
    Kirk Driller K; Stephani T; Dimigen O; Sommer W
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Jul; 56(7):e13361. PubMed ID: 30848515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ERP study of preparatory and inhibitory mechanisms in a cued saccade task.
    Van der Stigchel S; Heslenfeld DJ; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 16595127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional capture by a color singleton is stronger at spatially relevant than irrelevant locations: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Su Y; Huang W; Yang N; Yan K; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13640. PubMed ID: 33460208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The time course of spatial orienting elicited by central and peripheral cues: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2000 Jul; 53(2-3):253-8. PubMed ID: 10967235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention.
    Hong X; Bo K; Meyyappan S; Tong S; Ding M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Oct; 41(14):3900-3921. PubMed ID: 32542852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of working memory load on electrophysiological markers of visuospatial orienting in a spatial cueing task simulating a traffic situation.
    Vossen AY; Ross V; Jongen EM; Ruiter RA; Smulders FT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 26524126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye movement preparation causes spatially-specific modulation of auditory processing: new evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Gherri E; Driver J; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1224():88-101. PubMed ID: 18614157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards understanding how we pay attention in naturalistic visual search settings.
    Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM; Matusz PJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 244():118556. PubMed ID: 34492292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deconstructing Reorienting of Attention: Cue Predictiveness Modulates the Inhibition of the No-target Side and the Hemispheric Distribution of the P1 Response to Invalid Targets.
    Doricchi F; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Pinto M; Caratelli L; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C; Lasaponara S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1046-1060. PubMed ID: 31967519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye gaze triggers reflexive attention shifts: evidence from lateralised ERPs.
    Feng Q; Zhang X
    Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 1589():37-44. PubMed ID: 25241361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.
    Bekhtereva V; Craddock M; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():254-266. PubMed ID: 25818682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do ERP components triggered during attentional orienting represent supramodal attentional control?
    Seiss E; Gherri E; Eardley AF; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 17850244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting.
    Eimer M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(5):408-20. PubMed ID: 7691565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological Evidence for Hyperfocusing of Spatial Attention in Schizophrenia.
    Kreither J; Lopez-Calderon J; Leonard CJ; Robinson BM; Ruffle A; Hahn B; Gold JM; Luck SJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 37(14):3813-3823. PubMed ID: 28283557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.