These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19411030)

  • 1. What causes the "wet diaper" artifact? computed tomography and magnetic resonance observations.
    Markowitz RI; Altes TA; Jaramillo D
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 19411030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro assessment of needle artifacts with an interactive three-dimensional MR fluoroscopy system.
    Thomas C; Springer F; Röthke M; Rempp H; Clasen S; Fritz J; Claussen CD; Pereira PL
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 20171560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias artifact suppression on MR volumes.
    Ardizzone E; Pirrone R; Gambino O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 18644657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aliasing artifacts with the BLADE technique: causes and effective suppression.
    Kojima S; Morita S; Ueno E; Hirata M; Shinohara H; Komori A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 21274986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of geometric distortions on magnetic resonance and cone beam computed tomography images used for planning and verification of high-dose rate brachytherapy cervical cancer treatment.
    Aubry JF; Cheung J; Morin O; Beaulieu L; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
    Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 20149759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomographic metal artifact reduction for the detection and quantitation of small features near large metallic implants: a comparison of published methods.
    Rinkel J; Dillon WP; Funk T; Gould R; Prevrhal S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 18664852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.
    Lee MJ; Kim S; Lee SA; Song HT; Huh YM; Kim DH; Han SH; Suh JS
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):791-803. PubMed ID: 17495293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro assessment of artifacts from commercially available markers for image-guided preoperative marking of bone and soft tissue lesions.
    Thomas C; Müller-Bierl BM; Rempp H; Siegmann K; Martirosian P; Claussen CD; Pereira PL
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Jul; 21(7):1100-4. PubMed ID: 20610184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging artifacts at 3.0T.
    Bernstein MA; Huston J; Ward HA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Oct; 24(4):735-46. PubMed ID: 16958057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image correction during large and rapid B(0) variations in an open MRI system with permanent magnets using navigator echoes and phase compensation.
    Li J; Wang Y; Jiang Y; Xie H; Li G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 27(7):988-93. PubMed ID: 19369023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Progress of studies for reduction of ghost artifact in magnetic resonance imaging].
    Chen C; Tao H; Wang S; Luo L
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 24(2):457-9. PubMed ID: 17591281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing postoperative artifacts on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Buckwalter KA; Lin C; Ford JM
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2011 Sep; 15(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 21928156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results.
    Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wet diaper artifact.
    Markowitz RI
    Pediatr Radiol; 2007 Dec; 37(12):1303. PubMed ID: 17926027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional quantification of susceptibility artifacts from various metals in magnetic resonance images.
    Imai H; Tanaka Y; Nomura N; Tsutsumi Y; Doi H; Kanno Z; Ohno K; Ono T; Hanawa T
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Sep; 9(9):8433-9. PubMed ID: 23707948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification: a phantom study.
    Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Berg A; Materka A; Dirisamer A; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19465863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A phantom study on component segregation for MR images using ICA.
    Miyakoshi M; Tomiyasu M; Bagarinao E; Murakami S; Nakai T
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):1025-8. PubMed ID: 19427799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slice offset frequency and shim adjustment for interactive steady-state free-precession (SSFP) imaging.
    Graves MJ; Wong P; Priest AN; Black RT; Lomas DJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 May; 29(5):1230-3. PubMed ID: 19388102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the pericardium.
    Lopez Costa I; Bhalla S
    Semin Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 43(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 18486684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.