These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19411212)
21. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction augments protein delivery into testes. Bekeredjian R; Kuecherer HF; Kroll RD; Katus HA; Hardt SE Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):386-9. PubMed ID: 17320694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct observations of ultrasound microbubble contrast agent interaction with the microvessel wall. Caskey CF; Stieger SM; Qin S; Dayton PA; Ferrara KW J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1191-200. PubMed ID: 17672665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. On the mechanisms of ultrasound contrast agents-induced arrhythmias. Tran TA; Le Guennec JY; Babuty D; Bougnoux P; Tranquart F; Bouakaz A Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1050-6. PubMed ID: 19195768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adhesion and ultrasound-induced delivery from monodisperse microbubbles in a parallel plate flow cell. Schmidt BJ; Sousa I; van Beek AA; Böhmer MR J Control Release; 2008 Oct; 131(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18639595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrasonic bubbles in medicine: influence of the shell. Postema M; Schmitz G Ultrason Sonochem; 2007 Apr; 14(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 17218145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On the relationship between encapsulated ultrasound contrast agent and pressure. Adam D; Sapunar M; Burla E Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 May; 31(5):673-86. PubMed ID: 15866417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accounting for the stability of microbubbles to multi-pulse excitation using a lipid-shedding model. O'Brien JP; Ovenden N; Stride E J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL180-5. PubMed ID: 21974489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability. Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative measurement of ultrasound disruption of polymer-shelled microbubbles. Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Tickner EG; Burns PN Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1777-86. PubMed ID: 17656011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles. Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Burns PN Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18343022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents. Bloch SH; Short RE; Ferrara KW; Wisner ER Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 15749568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microbubble destruction by dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation. Yeh CK; Su SY; Shen CC IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 May; 56(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 19473929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Physical principles of microbubbles for ultrasound imaging and therapy. Stride E Cerebrovasc Dis; 2009; 27 Suppl 2():1-13. PubMed ID: 19372656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]