These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19411506)

  • 1. An evidence-based approach to the adoption of new technology.
    Ahn H; Bhandari M; Schemitsch EH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():95-8. PubMed ID: 19411506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Innovation or regulation: IDEAL opportunity for consensus.
    McCulloch P; Schuller F
    Lancet; 2010 Sep; 376(9746):1034-6. PubMed ID: 20870081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adoption of new technology in sports medicine: case studies of the Gore-Tex prosthetic ligament and of thermal capsulorrhaphy.
    Virk SS; Kocher MS
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Jan; 27(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 20974526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. User's guide to a randomized trial about an orthopaedic implant.
    Vena D; Morrison E; Sprague S; Hanson B; Joensson A; Bhandari M
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2007; 17(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 18540854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Innovation in health care: the role of HTA in the introduction of new technologies].
    Bührlen B
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2010; 104(10):703-8. PubMed ID: 21147431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hierarchy of evidence: where observational studies fit in and why we need them.
    Hoppe DJ; Schemitsch EH; Morshed S; Tornetta P; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():2-9. PubMed ID: 19411493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Difficult ot evaluate new surgical methods. IDEAL gives better control of surgical innovation and development].
    Lundgren F; Troëng T
    Lakartidningen; 2011 May 25-31; 108(21):1178-9. PubMed ID: 21812240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applying 'technology assessment' and 'evidence based medicine' theory to interventional radiology. Part 1: Suggestions for the phased evaluation of new procedures.
    Malone DE; Maceneaney PM
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Dec; 55(12):929-37. PubMed ID: 11124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symposium: introducing technology into orthopaedic practice. How should it be done?
    Callaghan JJ; Crowninshield RD; Greenwald AS; Lieberman JR; Rosenberg AG; Lewallen DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 May; 87(5):1146-58. PubMed ID: 15866982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technology evolution: is it survival of the fittest?
    Zietman A; Goitein M; Tepper JE
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Sep; 28(27):4275-9. PubMed ID: 20697074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health care technology assessment. Basic principles and clinical applications.
    Bozic KJ; Pierce RG; Herndon JH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1305-14. PubMed ID: 15173308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
    Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Strategic Approach to Introducing New Technology Into Orthopaedic Practices.
    Wyatt RWB; Jayakumar P; Barber TC; Fleeter TB; Graves SE; Bozic KJ
    Instr Course Lect; 2020; 69():393-404. PubMed ID: 32017741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Picking winners": assessing new health technology.
    Anderson JN; Fennessy PA; Fennessy GA; Schattner RL; Burrows EA
    Med J Aust; 1999 Nov; 171(10):557-9. PubMed ID: 10816711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of evidence-based medicine: the role of experience and expert opinion.
    Wenger DR
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32 Suppl 2():S187-92. PubMed ID: 22890460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology.
    Hunink MG; Krestin GP
    Radiology; 2002 Mar; 222(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 11867773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence, appropriateness, and technology assessment in cardiology: a case study of computed tomography.
    Redberg RF
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 17211017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical approach to technology assessment: how do we and how should we choose the right treatment?
    Zietman A; Ibbott G
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22177874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing wasteful innovation.
    Siriwardena AN
    Qual Prim Care; 2013; 21(5):267-8. PubMed ID: 24119511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.