These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19411506)

  • 21. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.
    Barkun JS; Aronson JK; Feldman LS; Maddern GJ; Strasberg SM; ; Altman DG; Barkun JS; Blazeby JM; Boutron IC; Campbell WB; Clavien PA; Cook JA; Ergina PL; Flum DR; Glasziou P; Marshall JC; McCulloch P; Nicholl J; Reeves BC; Seiler CM; Meakins JL; Ashby D; Black N; Bunker J; Burton M; Campbell M; Chalkidou K; Chalmers I; de Leval M; Deeks J; Grant A; Gray M; Greenhalgh R; Jenicek M; Kehoe S; Lilford R; Littlejohns P; Loke Y; Madhock R; McPherson K; Rothwell P; Summerskill B; Taggart D; Tekkis P; Thompson M; Treasure T; Trohler U; Vandenbroucke J
    Lancet; 2009 Sep; 374(9695):1089-96. PubMed ID: 19782874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Health care technology assessment and adoption: a case study.
    Veluchamy S; Alder HC
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1989 May; 8(13):1-12. PubMed ID: 10304477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [When new methods are about to be introduced].
    Graff BA; Thürmer H; Søreide O; Norderhaug IN
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Feb; 128(4):472. PubMed ID: 18274585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Strategies to explore innovation in nursing practice.
    Price B
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Nov 8-14; 21(9):48-55; quiz 58. PubMed ID: 17137281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality, technology and outcomes: evolution and evaluation of new treatments and/or new technology.
    Fraass BA; Moran JM
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 22177873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinicians, decisions, and technology in the 21st century.
    Lanzafame RJ
    J Clin Laser Med Surg; 2000 Feb; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11189106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How can we assess the value of complex medical innovations in practice?
    Abrishami P; Boer A; Horstman K
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Jun; 15(3):369-71. PubMed ID: 25963313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When must a new approach to treatment be introduced? The ethics of technology assessment.
    Tanneberger S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1988; 4(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 10302410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating new surgical techniques in Australia: the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical experience.
    Maddern GJ; Middleton PF; Tooher R; Babidge WJ
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):115-28, ix-x. PubMed ID: 16442424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the assessment of five new interventional procedures in different countries.
    Plumb J; Lyratzopoulos G; Gallo H; Campbell B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jan; 26(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 20059787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Critical appraisal of the orthopaedic literature: therapeutic and economic analysis.
    Busse JW; Heetveld MJ
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 16497309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical trials of cost effectiveness in technology evaluation.
    Valk PE
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 10967629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Approaching hospital administration about adopting cooling technologies.
    Kirkland LL; Parham WM; Pastores SM
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7 Suppl):S290-4. PubMed ID: 19535961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diffusion of an innovation: adoption of MRI.
    Durick DA; Phillips ML
    Radiol Technol; 1988; 59(3):239-41. PubMed ID: 3340747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption.
    Poulin P; Austen L; Scott CM; Waddell CD; Dixon E; Poulin M; Lafrenière R
    J Health Organ Manag; 2013; 27(2):246-65. PubMed ID: 23802401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Budgeting and health technology assessment: first evidence obtained from proposal forms used to submit the adoption of new technology.
    Lettieri E; Masella C; Nocco U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 18828947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Principles of designing a cohort study in orthopaedics.
    Bryant DM; Willits K; Hanson BP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():10-4. PubMed ID: 19411494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Technology assessment.
    SCI Nurs; 2002; 19(4):187-9. PubMed ID: 12616783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.