These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19411658)

  • 1. IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients?
    Roos EM; Davis A; Beynnon BD
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 May; 37(5):1042-3; author reply 1043. PubMed ID: 19411658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients?
    Hambly K; Griva K
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Sep; 36(9):1695-704. PubMed ID: 18577582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement.
    Wang YC; Hart DL; Stratford PW; Mioduski JE
    Phys Ther; 2011 May; 91(5):675-88. PubMed ID: 21372203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Knee injury rating scales.
    Lysholm J; Tegner Y
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Aug; 78(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 17965996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and comprehensibility of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation form in Children.
    Iversen MD; Lee B; Connell P; Andersen J; Anderson AF; Kocher MS
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2010 Feb; 20(1):e87-95. PubMed ID: 19486476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knee sports injury outcome measures.
    Wright RW
    J Knee Surg; 2005 Jan; 18(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 15742600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining change.
    Reider B
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1565-6. PubMed ID: 16926340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cartilage repair.
    Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 57(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16194597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal change is sensitive, less specific to recovery: a diagnostic testing approach to interpretability.
    Beaton DE; van Eerd D; Smith P; van der Velde G; Cullen K; Kennedy CA; Hogg-Johnson S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 21109396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. T1(Gd) gives comparable information as Delta T1 relaxation rate in dGEMRIC evaluation of cartilage repair tissue.
    Trattnig S; Burstein D; Szomolanyi P; Pinker K; Welsch GH; Mamisch TC
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):598-602. PubMed ID: 19692842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responsiveness in quality-of-life assessment: nomenclature, determinants, and clinical applications.
    Epstein RS
    Med Care; 2000 Sep; 38(9 Suppl):II91-4. PubMed ID: 10982094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Items, Instruments, Crosswalks, and PROMIS.
    Fries JF; Krishnan E; Bruce B
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1093-5. PubMed ID: 19509084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autologous chondrocytes implantation for traumatic cartilage defects of the knee.
    Kasemkijwattana C; Kesprayura S; Chaipinyo K; Chanlalit C; Chansiri K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 May; 92(5):648-53. PubMed ID: 19459526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional outcomes post carpal tunnel release: a modified replication of a previous study.
    Appleby MA; Neville-Smith M; Parrott MW
    J Hand Ther; 2009; 22(3):240-8; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19457636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generic or global outcome measures in rehabilitation: are they appropriate for measuring (and improving) service quality?
    Wade D
    Clin Rehabil; 2009 Oct; 23(10):867-72. PubMed ID: 19779005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the evaluation of medical products for regulatory approval.
    Burke LB; Kennedy DL; Miskala PH; Papadopoulos EJ; Trentacosti AM
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 84(2):281-3. PubMed ID: 18580868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient reported outcome measures in rhinology.
    Hopkins C
    Rhinology; 2009 Mar; 47(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19382488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invited commentary.
    Escorpizo R; Cieza A; Stucki G
    Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 89(8):825-7; author reply 827-8. PubMed ID: 19648105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease--validation against condition-specific measures.
    Guilfoyle MR; Seeley H; Laing RJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2009 Aug; 23(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 19637011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.