276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19412021)
1. Dynamic positioning of scoliotic patients during spine instrumentation surgery.
Duke K; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Koller A; Labelle H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 19412021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of the Relton-Hall operative frame on trunk deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mac-Thiong JM; Labelle H; Petit Y; Aubin CE
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):556-60. PubMed ID: 12522713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison between the prone and lateral position for performing a thoracoscopic anterior release and fusion for pediatric spinal deformity.
Sucato DJ; Elerson E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2176-80. PubMed ID: 14501933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of patient positioning on a dynamic frame for scoliosis surgery.
Duke K; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Koller A; Joncas J; Aubin CE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():144-8. PubMed ID: 15457712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative tracking of the trunk during posterior instrumentation of the scoliotic spine: a feasibility study.
Mac-Thiong JM; Labelle H; Vandal S; Aubin CE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():410-4. PubMed ID: 15456073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical simulations of scoliotic spine correction due to prone position and anaesthesia prior to surgical instrumentation.
Duke K; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Labelle H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Nov; 20(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 16061317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prone thoracoscopic release does not adversely affect pulmonary function when added to a posterior spinal fusion for severe spine deformity.
Sucato DJ; Erken YH; Davis S; Gist T; McClung A; Rathjen KE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):771-8. PubMed ID: 19365244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of thoracic scoliosis: are monoaxial thoracic pedicle screws the best form of fixation for correction?
Lonner BS; Auerbach JD; Boachie-Adjei O; Shah SA; Hosogane N; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):845-51. PubMed ID: 19365255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of prone surgical positioning on the scoliotic spine.
Driscoll CR; Aubin CÉ; Canet F; Labelle H; Dansereau J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 May; 25(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 21423056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries.
Aubin CE; Labelle H; Chevrefils C; Desroches G; Clin J; Eng AB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2143-52. PubMed ID: 18794755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra-operative tracking of the trunk during surgical correction of scoliosis: a feasibility study.
Mac-Thiong JM; Labelle H; Vandal S; Aubin CE
Comput Aided Surg; 2000; 5(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 11169879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward the next generation of simulator for intraoperative navigation of scoliotic spine surgeries.
Cartiaux O; Aubin CÉ; Labelle H; Cheriet F
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 176():322-5. PubMed ID: 22744520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity: a study of 145 patients.
Langeloo DD; Lelivelt A; Louis Journée H; Slappendel R; de Kleuver M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):1043-50. PubMed ID: 12768147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study of the pressures applied by a Chêneau brace for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Pham VM; Houilliez A; Schill A; Carpentier A; Herbaux B; Thevenon A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 18609033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability of intraoperative monitoring in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a 23-year experience of 3436 surgical cases.
Thuet ED; Winscher JC; Padberg AM; Bridwell KH; Lenke LG; Dobbs MB; Schootman M; Luhmann SJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(20):1880-6. PubMed ID: 20802388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Loss of intraoperative neurological monitoring signals during flexed prone positioning on a hinged open frame during surgery for kyphoscoliosis correction: case report.
Graham RB; Cotton M; Koht A; Koski TR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):339-343. PubMed ID: 29932358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neurogenic motor evoked potentials: a prospective comparison of stimulation methods in spinal deformity surgery.
Komanetsky RM; Padberg AM; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Russo MH; Chapman MP; Hamill CL
J Spinal Disord; 1998 Feb; 11(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 9493766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity.
Sponseller PD; Takenaga RK; Newton P; Boachie O; Flynn J; Letko L; Betz R; Bridwell K; Gupta M; Marks M; Bastrom T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(21):2305-9. PubMed ID: 18827696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Crandall DG; Revella J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between the Cotrel-Dubousset and the pedicle screw-plate instrumentations in the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Wajanavisit W; Woratanarat P; Thiabratana P; Woratanarat T; Laohacharoensombat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Sep; 92 Suppl5():S95-101. PubMed ID: 19894336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
