BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

935 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19412024)

  • 1. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety.
    Selznick LA; Shamji MF; Isaacs RE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 19412024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
    Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience.
    Tormenti MJ; Maserati MB; Bonfield CM; Gerszten PC; Moossy JJ; Kanter AS; Spiro RM; Okonkwo DO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 21999389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion in patients older than 70 years of age: analysis of peri- and postoperative complications.
    Karikari IO; Grossi PM; Nimjee SM; Hardin C; Hodges TR; Hughes BD; Brown CR; Isaacs RE
    Neurosurgery; 2011 Apr; 68(4):897-902; discussion 902. PubMed ID: 21221024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20927557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
    Mehta VA; McGirt MJ; Garcés Ambrossi GL; Parker SL; Sciubba DM; Bydon A; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Witham TF
    Neurol Res; 2011 Jan; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medialized, Muscle-Splitting Approach for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique and Multicenter Perioperative Results.
    Khanna N; Deol G; Poulter G; Ahuja A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S90-6. PubMed ID: 26839995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
    Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.
    Lau D; Terman SW; Patel R; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 23394166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive lumbar transfacet screw fixation in the lateral decubitus position after extreme lateral interbody fusion: a technique and feasibility study.
    Voyadzis JM; Anaizi AN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 23529152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative surgical complications and learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institute experience.
    Park Y; Lee SB; Seok SO; Jo BW; Ha JW
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2015 Mar; 7(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 25729524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
    Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Liu J; Deng H; Long X; Chen X; Xu R; Liu Z
    Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 26126415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-assisted Percutaneous Transfacet Screw Fixation Supplementing Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Procedure: Accuracy and Safety Evaluation of This Novel Minimally Invasive Technique.
    Wu JY; Yuan Q; Liu YJ; Sun YQ; Zhang Y; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2019 Feb; 11(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 30776856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.