195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19413006)
1. When our eyes deceive us.
Lithwick D
Newsweek; 2009 Mar; 153(12):17. PubMed ID: 19413006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Crime and punishment.
Opar A
Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary: Atkins and clinical practice.
Weiss KJ; Haskins B; Hauser MJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15515920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The court expert and his opinion in legal proceedings].
Szmidt W
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 17691174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Position and role of the court medical expert in the light of expectations of the legal proceedings agency].
Ustjanicz B
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 17691173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Position and role of the court expert in the light of expectations of the legal proceedings agency].
Piotrowska I
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 17691175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex offender registration and community notification challenges: the Supreme Court continues its trend.
Scott CL; Gerbasi JB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 14974805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Problems with terminology in forensic science, medicine, and law].
Mazak-Lucyk Z; Lucyk W
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15984116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Bibliography of the Polish papers on forensic medicine, criminology and related fields published in 2002].
Baran E
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2003; 53(3):257-75. PubMed ID: 14740629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When used in the criminal legal process forensic science shows a bias in favour of the prosecution. Discuss.
Burns DC
Sci Justice; 2001; 41(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 11793884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary: Atkins on a diet--a fit but lean guide for policy-makers.
Fitch WL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 15515921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The rights of pregnant women: the Supreme Court and drug testing.
Gostin LO
Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 12974111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of selected changes in project the penal code].
Berent J; Jurczyk AP; Szram S
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2002; 52(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 14669689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reform of the criminal justice system in England and Wales.
Forrest R
Sci Justice; 2001; 41(4):237. PubMed ID: 11793880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The physician as gatekeeper to the use of genetic information in the criminal justice system.
Seiden SC; Morin K;
J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 11905274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Forensic science.
Giannelli PC
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):535-44. PubMed ID: 16240733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Supreme Court limits use of forced medications for criminal defendants.
Young D
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2003 Aug; 60(15):1515-6. PubMed ID: 12951750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reply to Schafer: ethics and state extremism in defense of liberty.
Candilis PJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(4):452-6. PubMed ID: 11785619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]