These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19413389)

  • 1. On the interaction between incisor crown-root morphology and third-order angulation.
    Knösel M; Jung K; Attin T; Engelke W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Gripp-Rudolph L; Attin R
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 19413389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the relevance of "ideal" occlusion concepts for incisor inclination target definition.
    Knösel M; Jung K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 22051485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric assessment of the axial inclination of upper and lower incisors in relation to the third-order angle.
    Knösel M; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 17522804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
    Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between crown-root angulation (collum angle) of maxillary central incisors in Class II, division 2 malocclusion and lower lip line.
    Srinivasan B; Kailasam V; Chitharanjan A; Ramalingam A
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e66-74. PubMed ID: 23646340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
    Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
    Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crown-root shape of the permanent maxillary central incisor.
    McIntyre GT; Millett DT
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):710-5. PubMed ID: 14719737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A long-term assessment of the mechanical retroclination of lower incisors.
    Mills JR
    Angle Orthod; 1967 Jul; 37(3):165-74. PubMed ID: 19919212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of skeletal changes between female adolescents and adults with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion after orthodontic treatment.
    Ding Y; Zhao JH; Deng JR; Wang XJ
    Chin J Dent Res; 2012; 15(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 23509835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anterior maxillary dentoalveolar and skeletal cephalometric factors involved in upper incisor crown exposure in subjects with Class II and III skeletal open bite.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 24708039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship of third molar movement during orthodontic treatment and root angulation.
    Oshagh M; Nasrabadi NI
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 23649066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames.
    Li JL; Kau C; Wang M
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Jun; 15(1):41. PubMed ID: 25033937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic evaluation of the features influencing the accuracy of third order measurements.
    Knösel M; Jung K; Attin T; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Gripp-Rudolph L
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 19447839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.