293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19413392)
1. Forces produced by different nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of apically displaced teeth.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M; Defraia E; Barbato E
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 19413392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orthodontic forces released by low-friction versus conventional systems during alignment of apically or buccally malposed teeth.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M; Defraia E
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 20631083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forces released by nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of buccally displaced teeth.
Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Giuntini V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):316.e1-6; discussion 316-7. PubMed ID: 19732660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frictional resistance in monocrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional and nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.
Galvão MB; Camporesi M; Tortamano A; Dominguez GC; Defraia E
Prog Orthod; 2013 May; 14():9. PubMed ID: 24325886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Friction: self-ligating brackets].
Thermac G; Morgon L; Godeneche J
Orthod Fr; 2008 Dec; 79(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 19061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Brackets and friction in orthodontics: experimental study].
Ben Rejeb Jdir S; Tobji S; Turki W; Dallel I; Khedher N; Ben Amor A
Orthod Fr; 2015 Sep; 86(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 26370596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the friction forces delivered by different elastomeric patterns and metal ligature on conventional metal brackets with a NiTi arch wire versus a self-ligating system: An in vitro study.
Pieroni M; Ferraz Facury AGB; Santamaria-Jr M; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Vedovello Filho M; Costa AR; Neves JG
Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100633. PubMed ID: 35339407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.
Leite VV; Lopes MB; Gonini Júnior A; Almeida MR; Moura SK; Almeida RR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro frictional forces generated by three different ligation methods.
Gandini P; Orsi L; Bertoncini C; Massironi S; Franchi L
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):917-21. PubMed ID: 18298218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orthodontic treatment with preadjusted appliances and low-friction ligatures: experimental evidence and clinical observations.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Fortini A
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18426099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forces released during alignment with a preadjusted appliance with different types of elastomeric ligatures.
Franchi L; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):687-90. PubMed ID: 16679210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.
Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Barbato E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 18174077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
