These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19413396)

  • 21. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
    da Silveira HL; Silveira HE
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
    Naoumova J; Lindman R
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
    Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
    Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of primary correction of nasal septal deformity in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate on the craniofacial morphology.
    Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Gawrych E; Wędrychowska-Szulc B; Stepien P; Konury J; Wilk G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 41(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 23273648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Permutation method for evaluating topographic craniofacial correlations.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e211-7. PubMed ID: 21392664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve.
    Standerwick R; Roberts E; Hartsfield J; Babler W; Kanomi R
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2008 Dec; 291(12):1603-10. PubMed ID: 18833570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
    Gliddon MJ; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Wong HT; Lasky RE; Teichgraeber JF; Jia X; Liebschner MA; Lemoine JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16413890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods.
    Davis DN; Mackay F
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 1911687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characteristics of Down syndrome subjects in a Saudi sample.
    Korayem MA; AlKofide EA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23745979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison between full face and hemifacial CBCT cephalograms in clinically symmetrical patients: a pilot study.
    Junqueira CH; Janson G; Junqueira MH; Mendes LM; Favilla EE; Garib DG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 25992992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
    Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods.
    Jabbal A; Cobourne M; Donaldson N; Bister D
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 25888531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Craniofacial morphology in pediatric patients with persistent obstructive sleep apnea with or without positive airway pressure therapy: a cross-sectional cephalometric comparison with controls.
    Korayem MM; Witmans M; MacLean J; Heo G; El-Hakim H; Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 23810049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Craniofacial morphology of the frontonasal segment in patients with one or two macrodontic maxillary central incisors.
    Kenrad AB; Christensen IJ; Kjær I
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 23041936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication system versus the hand-tracing method--a preliminary study.
    Singh P; Davies TI
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 20923935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Cho HJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Apr; 43(4):235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273. PubMed ID: 19458456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cephalometric determinants of successful functional appliance therapy.
    Patel HP; Moseley HC; Noar JH
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 12401049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.