These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19413396)

  • 41. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods.
    Albarakati SF; Kula KS; Ghoneima AA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22184624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Soft tissue images from cephalograms compared with those from a 3D surface acquisition system.
    Incrapera AK; Kau CH; English JD; McGrory K; Sarver DM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 19852641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II.
    de Lira Ade L; de Moura WL; Artese F; Bittencourt MA; Nojima LI
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 23201327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Craniofacial morphology characteristics of operated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients in mixed dentition.
    Liu R; Lu D; Wamalwa P; Li C; Hu H; Zou S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21831675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Procuste cephalometry].
    Penin X
    Orthod Fr; 2006 Dec; 77(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 17402222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
    Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment of inter- and intra-operator cephalometric tracings on cone beam CT radiographs: comparison of the precision of the cone beam CT versus the latero-lateral radiograph tracing.
    Farronato G; Salvadori S; Nolet F; Zoia A; Farronato D
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Jan; 15():1. PubMed ID: 24393493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
    Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 24160993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Variability of the cranial and dental phenotype in Williams syndrome.
    Axelsson S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (170):3-67. PubMed ID: 15762376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods.
    Ongkosuwito EM; Katsaros C; van 't Hof MA; Bodegom JC; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):655-65. PubMed ID: 12512783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
    Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cephalometric assessment of effect of head rotation toward focal spot on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Naresh V; Lokesh NK; Pratapvarma KV; Srikrishna C; Chakravarthy VG; Shamnur N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 23811646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of magnification and superimposition of structures on cephalometric diagnosis.
    Paula LK; Solon-de-Mello Pde A; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 25992984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Predictability of prebent advancement plates for use in maxillomandibular advancement surgery.
    Lye KW; Waite PD; Wang D; Sittitavornwong S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1625-9. PubMed ID: 18634950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. "Black Bone" MRI: a potential non-ionizing method for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis--a preliminary feasibility study.
    Eley KA; Watt-Smith SR; Golding SJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130236. PubMed ID: 24052254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.