These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19413513)

  • 1. Private obstetric intervention: good, bad or whatever?
    Pesce AF
    Med J Aust; 2009 May; 190(9):467-8. PubMed ID: 19413513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adverse outcomes of labour in public and private hospitals in Australia. Comment.
    Tracy SK; Welsh AW; Dahlen HG; Tracy MB
    Med J Aust; 2009 Nov; 191(10):579-80. PubMed ID: 20050280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adverse outcomes of labour in public and private hospitals in Australia. Comment.
    Chambers DC
    Med J Aust; 2009 Nov; 191(10):578-9. PubMed ID: 20050279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse outcomes of labour in public and private hospitals in Australia. Comment.
    Evans N; Malcolm G; Gordon A
    Med J Aust; 2009 Nov; 191(10):579. PubMed ID: 20030030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adverse outcomes of labour in public and private hospitals in Australia. Comment.
    Coory MD; Koh GT; Flenady V; Kamp M
    Med J Aust; 2009 Nov; 191(10):578. PubMed ID: 19912098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence and outcome of caesarean section in the private sector--3-year experience at Pretoria Gynaecological Hospital.
    Tshibangu KC; de Jongh MA; de Villiers DJ; du Toit JJ; Shah SM
    S Afr Med J; 2002 Dec; 92(12):956-9. PubMed ID: 12561407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adverse outcomes of labour in public and private hospitals in Australia.
    Sutherland GA; Gartland D; Yelland JS; Brown SJ
    Med J Aust; 2009 May; 190(9):518-9; author reply 519. PubMed ID: 19413533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the effect on outcomes of public or private provision of prenatal care in Portugal.
    Correia S; Rodrigues T; Barros H
    Matern Child Health J; 2015 Jul; 19(7):1574-83. PubMed ID: 25636645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Going public: do risk and choice explain differences in caesarean birth rates between public and private places of birth in Australia?
    Miller YD; Prosser SJ; Thompson R
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 22877762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adverse outcomes of labour in public and private hospitals in Australia.
    Watson LF; Davey MA; Biro MA; King JF
    Med J Aust; 2009 May; 190(9):519; author reply 519. PubMed ID: 19514106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of private health insurance incentives on obstetric outcomes in NSW hospitals.
    Shorten B; Shorten A
    Aust Health Rev; 2004; 27(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 15362294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public-private differences in short-term neonatal outcomes following birth by prelabour caesarean section at early and full term.
    Adams N; Gibbons KS; Tudehope D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Apr; 57(2):176-185. PubMed ID: 28326546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of obstetric morbidity and management between clinic and private patients.
    Chang A; Keeping JD; Morrison J; Esler EJ
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Aug; 19(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 293168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Differences in the likelihood of caesareans, associated with dependency on hospitals, the volume of cases and the obstetric risk].
    Sarría-Santamera A; López-Madurga ET
    Aten Primaria; 2003 Oct; 32(6):389-90. PubMed ID: 14572406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of factors influencing the rise of cesarean sections rates in Pakistan, using MCDM.
    Ali Y; Khan MW; Mumtaz U; Salman A; Muhammad N; Sabir M
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Oct; 31(8):1058-1069. PubMed ID: 30415618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TWIN PREGNANCY. A 12 YEAR REVIEW FROM A PRIVATE HOSPITAL SERVICE.
    SPARLING DW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1964 Feb; 88():349-55. PubMed ID: 14123406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Variability in the cesarean ratio and indications for the procedure among Spanish hospitals].
    Redondo A; Sáez M; Oliva P; Soler M; Arias A
    Gac Sanit; 2013; 27(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 23246252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in Brazil.
    Almeida Sd; Bettiol H; Barbieri MA; Silva AA; Ribeiro VS
    Cad Saude Publica; 2008 Dec; 24(12):2909-18. PubMed ID: 19082282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is there unwarranted variation in obstetric practice in Australia? Obstetric intervention trends in Queensland hospitals.
    Fox H; Callander E; Lindsay D; Topp SM
    Aust Health Rev; 2021 Mar; 45(2):157-166. PubMed ID: 33517975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perineal outcomes in NSW public and private hospitals: analysing recent trends.
    Shorten A; Shorten B
    Aust J Midwifery; 2002; 15(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 12219425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.