These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19414534)

  • 1. Ratio adjustment and calibration scheme for gene-wise normalization to enhance microarray inter-study prediction.
    Cheng C; Shen K; Song C; Luo J; Tseng GC
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(13):1655-61. PubMed ID: 19414534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of normalization methods for cDNA microarray data by k-NN classification.
    Wu W; Xing EP; Myers C; Mian IS; Bissell MJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():191. PubMed ID: 16045803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Module-based prediction approach for robust inter-study predictions in microarray data.
    Mi Z; Shen K; Song N; Cheng C; Song C; Kaminski N; Tseng GC
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 26(20):2586-93. PubMed ID: 20719761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A robust two-way semi-linear model for normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Wang D; Huang J; Xie H; Manzella L; Soares MB
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():14. PubMed ID: 15663789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological study of affine transformations of gene expression data with proposed robust non-parametric multi-dimensional normalization method.
    Bengtsson H; Hössjer O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():100. PubMed ID: 16509971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CrossNorm: a novel normalization strategy for microarray data in cancers.
    Cheng L; Lo LY; Tang NL; Wang D; Leung KS
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():18898. PubMed ID: 26732145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can Zipf's law be adapted to normalize microarrays?
    Lu T; Costello CM; Croucher PJ; Häsler R; Deuschl G; Schreiber S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():37. PubMed ID: 15727680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of sample size on robustness and prediction accuracy of a prognostic gene signature.
    Kim SY
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 May; 10():147. PubMed ID: 19445687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New normalization methods for cDNA microarray data.
    Wilson DL; Buckley MJ; Helliwell CA; Wilson IW
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(11):1325-32. PubMed ID: 12874043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Affymetrix data normalization methods using 6,926 experiments across five array generations.
    Autio R; Kilpinen S; Saarela M; Kallioniemi O; Hautaniemi S; Astola J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S24. PubMed ID: 19208124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The sensitivity of transcriptomics BMD modeling to the methods used for microarray data normalization.
    Mezencev R; Auerbach SS
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232955. PubMed ID: 32413060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Merging microarray data from separate breast cancer studies provides a robust prognostic test.
    Xu L; Tan AC; Winslow RL; Geman D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():125. PubMed ID: 18304324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification between normal and tumor tissues based on the pair-wise gene expression ratio.
    Yap Y; Zhang X; Ling MT; Wang X; Wong YC; Danchin A
    BMC Cancer; 2004 Oct; 4():72. PubMed ID: 15469618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of normalization on the correlation structure of microarray data.
    Qiu X; Brooks AI; Klebanov L; Yakovlev N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():120. PubMed ID: 15904488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimized LOWESS normalization parameter selection for DNA microarray data.
    Berger JA; Hautaniemi S; Järvinen AK; Edgren H; Mitra SK; Astola J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 5():194. PubMed ID: 15588297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microarray Data Analysis for Transcriptome Profiling.
    Sun MA; Shao X; Wang Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1751():17-33. PubMed ID: 29508287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating concentration estimation errors in ELISA microarray experiments.
    Daly DS; White AM; Varnum SM; Anderson KK; Zangar RC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():17. PubMed ID: 15673468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating Nonlinear Relationships in Microarray Missing Value Imputation.
    Yu T; Peng H; Sun W
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(3):723-31. PubMed ID: 20733236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of normalization methods for analysis of microarrays containing a high degree of gene effects.
    Ni TT; Lemon WJ; Shyr Y; Zhong TP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 9():505. PubMed ID: 19040742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A stepwise framework for the normalization of array CGH data.
    Khojasteh M; Lam WL; Ward RK; MacAulay C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():274. PubMed ID: 16297240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.