126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19416410)
1. Re: Surgical practices for urological tumors: a nation-wide survey in Japan in 2005.
Kawakami S; Kihara K
Int J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):429. PubMed ID: 19416410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical practices for urological tumors: a nation-wide survey in Japan in 2005.
Kawakami S; Kihara K; ;
Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):257-62; discussion 262. PubMed ID: 19215318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Lymph node surgery in urological tumors].
Rübben H
Urologe A; 2009 Jan; 48(1):5. PubMed ID: 19093094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Organ-sparing treatment of urological cancers].
Thüroff JW
Urologe A; 2008 Jul; 47(7):801-2. PubMed ID: 18584145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Organ- and function-preserving surgery in urological tumors].
Rübben H
Urologe A; 2014 Sep; 53(9):1283. PubMed ID: 25159336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Urologic cancer--when is less more?
Droller MJ
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1837-9. PubMed ID: 17869308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative assessment for major urological surgery: where are we now?
Hicks J; Dobbins T
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(6):886. PubMed ID: 20353540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New procedures are bound to modify our attitude in facing urologic cancers in the near future: are we ready for a cost-effectiveness analysis?
Colombo R
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 17399890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient or cancer sparing urological surgery--too much or too little?
Rowland RG
J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1278-9. PubMed ID: 20171680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Out of country health care.
Klotz LH
Can J Urol; 2006 Feb; 13(1):2947. PubMed ID: 16515748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From the many to the few: changes in urological cancer surgery provision.
Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
Br J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 92(5):797-8. PubMed ID: 15756249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical considerations for elderly urologic oncology patients.
Schuckman AK; Stein JP; Skinner D
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(6):628-32. PubMed ID: 19879473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consensus document: recommendations for optimal surgical wait times for patients with urological malignancies.
Canadian Surgical Wait Times (SWAT) Initiative
Can J Urol; 2006 Jun; 13 Suppl 3():62-4. PubMed ID: 16818014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Laparoscopy in urologic oncology].
Hernández Fernández C
Actas Urol Esp; 2006 May; 30(5):437-8. PubMed ID: 16884089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical margins following urological cancer surgery and clinical outcomes--does the United States need regional centralization of cancer care?
Lowrance WT
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2126-7. PubMed ID: 20399470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommendations for urological cancers issued by NICE.
Neal D;
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2003 Apr; 15(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 12708712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. LESS is more ... but needs even more.
Desai MM; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2011 Nov; 60(5):1006-7; discussion 1008-9. PubMed ID: 21885182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommendations for urological cancers issued by NICE.
Wallace DM
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2003 Apr; 15(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 12708711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What's new in urology.
Thrasher JB
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Sep; 201(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 16125079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the impact of minimally invasive vs open trials in urologic malignancy. Are we missing the mark?
Boris RS; Calaway AC
Urol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):643-645. PubMed ID: 33248668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
