These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1941777)

  • 1. Ultraconservative sealed restorations: three-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Williams JE; Schuster GS; Smith CD; Pierce KL; Mackert JR; Sherrer JD; Wenner KK; Davis QB; Garman TA
    J Public Health Dent; 1991; 51(4):239-50. PubMed ID: 1941777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Adair SM; Sams DR; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Hawkins KI; Mackert JR; O'Dell NL; Richards EE; Rueggeberg F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 7608378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sealed restorations: 5-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Richards EE; Williams JE; Smith CD; Mackert JR; Schuster GS; Sherrer JD; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Wenner KK
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 1524744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sealed restorations: 4-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Williams JE; Pierce KL; Smith CD; Schuster GS; Mackert JR; Sherrer JD; Wenner KK; Richards EE; Davis QB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 2003895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Rueggeberg FA; Adair SM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 129(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9448347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical performance of sealed composite restorations placed over caries compared with sealed and unsealed amalgam restorations.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Call-Smith KM; Shuster GS; Williams JE; Davis QB; Smith CD; Bell RA; Sherrer JD; Myers DR; Morse PK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Nov; 115(5):689-94. PubMed ID: 3479490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(6):395-400. PubMed ID: 8636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.
    Kinomoto Y; Inoue Y; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 15478486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caries preventive effect of occlusal sealant extension to ART restorations compared with non-extended amalgam restorations.
    Frencken JE; van 't Hof MA; Taifour D
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2007; 5(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17366762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical evaluation of air-abrasion treatment of questionable carious lesions. A 12-month report.
    Hamilton JC; Dennison JB; Stoffers KW; Welch KB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jun; 132(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 11433855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sealing occlusal caries lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2-3 years of follow-up.
    Bakhshandeh A; Qvist V; Ekstrand KR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):521-9. PubMed ID: 21479565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early treatment of incipient carious lesions: a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Hamilton JC; Dennison JB; Stoffers KW; Gregory WA; Welch KB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Dec; 133(12):1643-51. PubMed ID: 12512664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of a composite resin system with a dentin bonding agent for restoration of permanent posterior teeth: a 3-year study.
    Roberts MW; Folio J; Moffa JP; Guckes AD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 1507089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.