These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19417876)

  • 21. Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosa-implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
    Assad AS; Abd El-Dayem MA; Badawy MM
    Implant Dent; 2004 Dec; 13(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 15592001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mandibular implant-retained complete overdenture using retentive abutments: a case report.
    Saha S; Ray-Chaudhuri A
    Dent Update; 2009 Apr; 36(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 19480103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.
    Oda K; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27677217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of LOCATOR attachments with different retentive forces on the stability of 2-implant-retained mandibular overdenture.
    Liu W; Zhang X; Qing H; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 31780109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of overdenture retention designs and implant orientations on load transfer characteristics.
    Federick DR; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 8957789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resilient Stud Versus Bar Attachments for Inclined Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures. An In Vitro Study of Loading and Dislodging Strains.
    Elhelbawy NG; ELsyad MA; Soliman TA; Mahrous A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(5):982-988. PubMed ID: 36170313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part I.
    Warreth A; Alkadhimi AF; Sultan A; Byrne C; Woods E
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015; 61(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 26281708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part II.
    Warreth A; Byrne C; Alkadhimi AF; Woods E; Sultan A
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015; 61(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26285567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report.
    Kleis WK; Kämmerer PW; Hartmann S; Al-Nawas B; Wagner W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 19416278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.