427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19418710)
1. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
Grant KW; Elhilali M; Shamma SA; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Summers V
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The robustness of hearing aid microphone preferences in everyday listening environments.
Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Grant KW; Summers V; Dittberner AB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 May; 18(5):358-79. PubMed ID: 17715647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening.
Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Dyrlund O
J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 May; 15(5):365-96. PubMed ID: 15506498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference.
Surr RK; Walden BE; Cord MT; Olson L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Jun; 13(6):308-22. PubMed ID: 12141388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Fischer RL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):628-46. PubMed ID: 27564441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids.
Chung K; McKibben N; Mongeau L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2529-42. PubMed ID: 20370035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
Chung K
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations.
Park HS; Moon IJ; Jin SH; Choi JE; Cho YS; Hong SH
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 8(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 26330918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of signal-to-noise ratio on directional microphone benefit and preference.
Walden BE; Surr RK; Grant KW; Van Summers W; Cord MT; Dyrlund O
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):662-76. PubMed ID: 16515138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
