These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19418859)

  • 1. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.
    Beier US; Grunert I; Kulmer S; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
    Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
    Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions.
    Samet N; Shohat M; Livny A; Weiss EI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 16046964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
    Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
    N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the quality of clinical procedures and technical standards of dental laboratories in fixed partial denture therapy.
    Albashaireh ZS; Alnegrish AS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 10635191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial.
    Luthardt RG; Walter MH; Weber A; Koch R; Rudolph H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18717091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut.
    Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of margin design on the fit of high-precious alloy restorations in patients.
    Wöstmann B; Blösser T; Gouentenoudis M; Balkenhol M; Ferger P
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):611-8. PubMed ID: 16005801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
    Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of an erbium laser in lieu of retraction cord: a modern technique.
    Scott A
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 15833012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical acceptability of crown margins versus marginal gaps as determined by pre-doctoral students and prosthodontists.
    Bronson MR; Lindquist TJ; Dawson DV
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 16359478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of sectional impressions and a transfer index for extensive fixed prosthodontic treatment.
    Garcia LT; Bohnenkamp DM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Jan; 25(1):26, 28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 15645877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions.
    Cloyd S; Puri S
    Dent Today; 1999 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10765795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.