299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19418868)
21. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately-loaded implants supporting mandibular fixed prostheses.
Kökat AM; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Akkocaoğlu M; Akça K; Cehreli MC
Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 19359867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects.
Simon H; Caputo AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 12507244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A simplified method to assess precision of fit between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study.
Calderini A; Maiorana C; Garlini G; Abbondanza T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 17974120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A 3-year retrospective study of Cresco frameworks: preload and complications.
Hjalmarsson L; Smedberg JI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(4):189-99. PubMed ID: 16336910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 3: Preload and tensile fracture load testing.
Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 18205737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Removal torques of conical, tapered implant abutments: the effects of anodization and reduction of surface area.
Squier RS; Psoter WJ; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11858571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Brånemark system implants.
Turkyilmaz I
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 33(10):754-9. PubMed ID: 16938104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reintegration success of osseotite implants after intentional countertorque liberation in the endentulous human mandible.
Lucente J; Galante J; Trisi P; Kenealy JN
Implant Dent; 2006 Jun; 15(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16766901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Screw Joint Stability in Conventional and Abutment-Free Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations.
Scherg S; Karl M
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 26929952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque.
Dailey B; Jordan L; Blind O; Tavernier B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 19492640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments.
Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Vaziri S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e224-30. PubMed ID: 22376004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Cresco Bridge and implant concept: presentation of a technology for fabrication of abutment-free, passively fitting superstructures.
Helldén LB; Ericson G; Olsson CO
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Feb; 25(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 15736782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs.
Lee FK; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 20657869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
