These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19418868)

  • 41. In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures.
    Koke U; Wolf A; Lenz P; Gilde H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15140174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone.
    Dilek O; Tezulas E; Dincel M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e20-7. PubMed ID: 18230373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Leone M; Consolo U; Ferri V; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):867-75. PubMed ID: 19014156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A methodology to study the effects of prosthesis misfit over time: an in vivo model.
    Karl M; Graef F; Heckmann S; Taylor T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 19885410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Practical clinical guidelines to prevent screw loosening.
    Hurson S
    Int J Dent Symp; 1995; 3(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9117862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
    Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stress levels for well-fitting implant superstructures as a function of tightening force levels, tightening sequence, and different operators.
    Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11458260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
    Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants.
    Jörnéus L; Jemt T; Carlsson L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 1289261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Restoration of the maxillary arch with a precision-milled double-bar prosthesis.
    English CE
    Int J Dent Symp; 1994; 2(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 9117846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of torque measurements and clinical handling of various surgical motors.
    Neugebauer J; Scheer M; Mischkowski RA; An SH; Karapetian VE; Toutenburg H; Zoeller JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):469-76. PubMed ID: 19587869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants.
    Ferreira MB; Delben JA; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e631-4. PubMed ID: 23172504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessment of the stress transmitted to dental implants connected to screw-retained bars using different casting techniques.
    Haselhuhn K; Marotti J; Tortamano P; Weiss C; Suleiman L; Wolfart S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 23270308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with a definitive prosthesis supported by an intraorally welded titanium bar.
    Degidi M; Nardi D; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 19492651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Description and evaluation of a simplified method to achieve passive fit between cast titanium frameworks and implants.
    Helldén LB; Dérand T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 9581404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of the marginal precision of one-piece complete arch titanium frameworks fabricated using five different methods for implant-supported restorations.
    Torsello F; di Torresanto VM; Ercoli C; Cordaro L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):772-9. PubMed ID: 18720557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of the casting technique and dynamic loading on screw detorque and misfit of single unit implant-supported prostheses.
    Bhering CL; Takahashi JM; Luthi LF; Henriques GE; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013; 71(3-4):404-9. PubMed ID: 22607236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Relation between implant/abutment vertical misfit and torque loss of abutment screws.
    Barbosa GA; Bernardes SR; das Neves FD; Fernandes Neto AJ; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 19180328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A prospective 5-year study of two cast framework alloys for fixed implant-supported mandibular prostheses.
    Murphy WM; Absi EG; Gregory MC; Williams KR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 11951802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.