These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19418868)

  • 61. An alternative section method for casting and posterior laser welding of metallic frameworks for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    de Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mde G; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19141050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Giro G; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21426405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw.
    Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 10635187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses.
    al-Turki LE; Chai J; Lautenschlager EP; Hutten MC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11887597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs.
    Karl M; Taylor TD; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Comparison of strains produced in a bone simulant between conventional cast and resin-luted implant frameworks.
    Clelland NL; van Putten MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 9425760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Stability of loaded and unloaded implants with different surfaces.
    Nergiz I; Arpak N; Bostanci H; Scorziello TM; Schmage P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 19492645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of vertical and horizontal discrepancy in cast copings for single-tooth implant-supported prostheses.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Zade MM
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 18784530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T; Jälevik T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 12737254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading.
    Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 19397637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets.
    Cehreli MC; Kökat AM; Comert A; Akkocaoğlu M; Tekdemir I; Akça K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19681964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Adapted preparation technique for screw-type implants: explorative in vitro pilot study in a porcine bone model.
    Beer A; Gahleitner A; Holm A; Birkfellner W; Homolka P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17224030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Prosthetic dilemmas. Immediate versus conventional loading of implants in the edentulous mandible].
    Stoker GT; Wismeijer D
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2008 Nov; 115(11):589-95. PubMed ID: 19058504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Fixed prosthesis with a milled bar for correcting misangled implants: a clinical report.
    Lee JH; Frias V; Woo C; Maiberg R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 17394909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The milled implant bar: an alternative to spark erosion.
    Brudvik JS; Chigurupati K
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 Sep; 68(8):485-8. PubMed ID: 12323104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four clinical variables.
    Weinberg LA; Kruger B
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):421-33. PubMed ID: 8595100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. An evaluation of fit in osseointegrated implant components using torque/turn analysis.
    Wicks RA; deRijk WG; Windeler AS
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Dec; 3(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 7866503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Preload evaluation of different screws in external hexagon joint.
    Assunção WG; Delben JA; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Garcia IR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22228458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.