These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19418905)

  • 1. Ethical review and the assessment of research proposals using qualitative research methods.
    Daly J; Bandyopadhyay M; Riggs E; Williamson L
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2008 Jul; 27(3):43-53. PubMed ID: 19418905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethics creep or governance creep? Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECS).
    Gorman SM
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2011 Sep; 29(4):14.1-16. PubMed ID: 22397089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human research ethics in practice: deliberative strategies, processes and perceptions.
    Gillam L; Guillemin M; Bolitho A; Rosenthal D
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2009 Mar; 28(1):7.1-17. PubMed ID: 19839277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is it appropriate for research ethics committees to make judgements about the scientific quality of research proposals?
    Brecher B; Gardener G; Velepič M; Walsh A; Belshaw C; Holland S
    Nurs Ethics; 2011 Jan; 18(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 21285203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research?
    McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 1519084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Leveling the playing field? Exploring the merits of the ethics-as-process approach for judging qualitative research proposals.
    Cutcliffe JR; Ramcharan P
    Qual Health Res; 2002 Sep; 12(7):1000-10. PubMed ID: 12214674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics of research involving humans: uniform processes for disparate categories?
    Parker M; Holt J; Turner G; Broerse J
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Jul; 22(3):50-65. PubMed ID: 14682320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Descriptive ethics: a qualitative study of local research ethics committees in Mexico.
    Valdez-Martinez E; Turnbull B; Garduño-Espinosa J; Porter JD
    Dev World Bioeth; 2006 May; 6(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 16594973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee.
    Koepsell D; Brinkman WP; Pont S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):1033-48. PubMed ID: 24938695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
    Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
    IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contextualising merit and integrity within human research.
    Pieper I; Thomson CJ
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2011 Sep; 29(4):15.1-10. PubMed ID: 22397090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction to special issue of Accountability in Research on the review and approval of biomedical research proposals: a call for a centralized national human research protections system.
    Mann H; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16770856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The job of 'ethics committees'.
    Moore A; Donnelly A
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):481-487. PubMed ID: 26566944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human research ethics committees in technical universities.
    Koepsell D; Brinkman WP; Pont S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 25746787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
    Dyck M; Allen G
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 22865925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cross-sectional survey to investigate community understanding of medical research ethics committees.
    Fritschi L; Kelsall HL; Loff B; Slegers C; Zion D; Glass DC
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 41(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 25605609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addressing the challenge for expedient ethical review of research in disasters and disease outbreaks.
    Aarons D
    Bioethics; 2019 Mar; 33(3):343-346. PubMed ID: 30511771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.