These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19418905)

  • 21. International variation in ethics committee requirements: comparisons across five Westernised nations.
    Goodyear-Smith F; Lobb B; Davies G; Nachson I; Seelau SM
    BMC Med Ethics; 2002 Apr; 3():E2. PubMed ID: 11964190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
    Himmelsbach CK
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-220. PubMed ID: 12085911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Guidance on Making Proposals to Conduct Gene Therapy Research on Human Subjects.
    Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (Great Britain)
    Gene Ther; 1994 Nov; 1(6):343-363 (inset). PubMed ID: 11644650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethical considerations in malaria research proposal review: empirical evidence from 114 proposals submitted to an Ethics Committee in Thailand.
    Adams P; Prakobtham S; Limphattharacharoen C; Vutikes P; Khusmith S; Pengsaa K; Wilairatana P; Kaewkungwal J
    Malar J; 2015 Sep; 14():342. PubMed ID: 26370243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
    Stevenson FA; Gibson W; Pelletier C; Chrysikou V; Park S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 May; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25952678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research ethics and approval process: A guide for new GP researchers.
    Liaw ST; Tam CW
    Aust Fam Physician; 2015 Jun; 44(6):419-22. PubMed ID: 26209996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?
    Pickworth E
    J Med Ethics; 2000 Oct; 26(5):330-3. PubMed ID: 11055034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An applied and qualitative LREC reflects on its practice.
    West E; Butler J
    Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Feb; (185):13-20. PubMed ID: 14983852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethical review of health promotion program evaluation proposals.
    Thurston WE; Vollman AR; Burgess MM
    Health Promot Pract; 2003 Jan; 4(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14610971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence-based practice of research ethics review?
    Beagan B; McDonald M
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 16459416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ethics in qualitative health research.
    Oberle KM
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 2002 Dec; 35(8 Suppl.):563-6. PubMed ID: 15015501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Framework for Assessing Scientific Merit in Ethical Review of Clinical Research.
    Binik A; Hey SP
    Ethics Hum Res; 2019 Mar; 41(2):2-13. PubMed ID: 30895755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Challenges faced by research ethics committees in El Salvador: results from a focus group study.
    Camp JW; Barfield RC; Rodriguez V; Young AJ; Finerman R; Caniza MA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 18302541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 2007 National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research: not worth the paper it is written on?
    Smith M
    Intern Med J; 2011 Jan; 41(1a):73. PubMed ID: 21265969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Ad Hoc Advisory Group's proposals for research ethics committees: a mixture of the timid, the revolutionary, and the bizarre.
    Dawson AJ
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 31(8):435-6. PubMed ID: 16076964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps.
    Osborne LW
    J Med Ethics; 1983 Jun; 9(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 6876099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Research ethical committees.
    Rowland M; Greenwood BM
    Lancet; 1983 Jul; 2(8344):288. PubMed ID: 11644264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.
    Atici E; Erdemir AD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 18375684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.