These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19418928)

  • 1. Summer conference report "Is what you see what you get" 4-6 July 2008: the Derbyshire Hotel, Derby.
    McCusker S
    Sci Justice; 2009 Mar; 49(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19418928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement.
    Budowle B; Bottrell MC; Bunch SG; Fram R; Harrison D; Meagher S; Oien CT; Peterson PE; Seiger DP; Smith MB; Smrz MA; Soltis GL; Stacey RB
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):798-809. PubMed ID: 19486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion.
    Association of Forensic Science Providers
    Sci Justice; 2009 Sep; 49(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 19839414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers.
    Willis S
    Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):49. PubMed ID: 20408380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The legal framework for more robust forensic science evidence.
    Rt Hon. the Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Miscarriages of justice and the forensic expert: the impact of the law commission's reforms.
    Phillips E
    Med Leg J; 2011; 79(Pt 3):94-9. PubMed ID: 21908490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Label the limits of forensic science.
    Mejia R
    Nature; 2017 Apr; 544(7648):7. PubMed ID: 28383000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation and professionalism.
    Evett I
    Sci Justice; 2009 Sep; 49(3):159-60. PubMed ID: 19839413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strengthening forensic science: a way station on the journey to justice.
    Bohan TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 20412154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Professionalism--duties and privileges.
    Forrest R
    Sci Justice; 2005; 45(1):1. PubMed ID: 15739686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The proposed Criminal Evidence (Experts) Bill……moving in the right direction..?
    Daéid NN
    Sci Justice; 2011 Jun; 51(2):41-2. PubMed ID: 21605823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accreditation of forensic science service providers.
    McCartney C; Nsiah Amoako E
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Jul; 65():143-145. PubMed ID: 31202474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental forensics: an emerging discipline within UK higher education?
    Astin KB; Bennett MR; Kneller P
    J Environ Monit; 2007 May; 9(5):400-2. PubMed ID: 17492083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science in court: Courage of conviction.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2015 Oct; 526(7573):463-5. PubMed ID: 26478935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forensic sciences in Mediterranean countries perspectives.
    Chadly A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Dec; 146 Suppl():S5-6. PubMed ID: 15639586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint meeting of the Scottish Institute for Policing Research and the Centre for Forensic Science, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, July 2009.
    Ludwig A; Hill L
    Sci Justice; 2009 Dec; 49(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 20120599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic science standards in fast-changing environments.
    Sommer P
    Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 20408377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation and Countermeasures of the Implementation of Forensic Clinical Identification Standards Based on the Perspective of Accreditation.
    Wang YB; Tang DZ; Gao JW; Wang YH; Chen Y; Li CT; He XD
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 35(4):467-471. PubMed ID: 31532159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changing the guard.
    Doyle S
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 23068770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expert evidence accountability: new developments and challenges.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2011 Dec; 19(2):209-24. PubMed ID: 22319996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.