247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19419553)
1. Assessing the empirical validity of alternative multi-attribute utility measures in the maternity context.
Petrou S; Morrell J; Spiby H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2009 May; 7():40. PubMed ID: 19419553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
Petrou S; Hockley C
Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain.
Ye Z; Sun L; Wang Q
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Apr; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 30971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between the EQ-5D and the SF-6D in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Chen J; Wong CK; McGhee SM; Pang PK; Yu WC
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112389. PubMed ID: 25379673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients.
Wu J; Han Y; Zhao FL; Zhou J; Chen Z; Sun H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Oct; 12():156. PubMed ID: 25343944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand.
Dritsaki M; Petrou S; Williams M; Lamb SE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Jan; 15(1):20. PubMed ID: 28118833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discriminative validity of the EQ-5D-5 L and SF-12 in older adults with arthritis.
Tawiah AK; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Johnson JA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Apr; 17(1):68. PubMed ID: 30995930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of Life and General Health After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Pathologies: Determining a Valid and Responsive Metric of Health State Utility.
Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Godil SS; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct; 77(4):553-60; discussion 560. PubMed ID: 26191977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unchained melody: revisiting the estimation of SF-6D values.
Craig BM
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):865-73. PubMed ID: 26359242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating the burden of disease in chronic pain with and without neuropathic characteristics: does the choice between the EQ-5D and SF-6D matter?
Torrance N; Lawson KD; Afolabi E; Bennett MI; Serpell MG; Dunn KM; Smith BH
Pain; 2014 Oct; 155(10):1996-2004. PubMed ID: 25020004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Harvie HS; Honeycutt AA; Neuwahl SJ; Barber MD; Richter HE; Visco AG; Sung VW; Shepherd JP; Rogers RG; Jakus-Waldman S; Mazloomdoost D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):265.e1-265.e11. PubMed ID: 30471259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health utility measurement for people living with HIV/AIDS under combined antiretroviral therapy: A comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D.
Wang X; Luo H; Yao E; Tang R; Dong W; Liu F; Liang J; Xiao M; Zhang Z; Niu J; Song L; Fu L; Li X; Qian S; Guo Q; Song Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(45):e31666. PubMed ID: 36397330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.
Selva-Sevilla C; Ferrara P; Gerónimo-Pardo M
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):649-662. PubMed ID: 32065301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.
Walters SJ; Brazier JE
Qual Life Res; 2005 Aug; 14(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16110932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
Yang F; Lau T; Lee E; Vathsala A; Chia KS; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Dec; 16(9):1019-26. PubMed ID: 25519850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Properties of patient-reported outcome measures in individuals following acute whiplash injury.
Pink J; Petrou S; Williamson E; Williams M; Lamb SE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Mar; 12():38. PubMed ID: 24625124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
