240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19420307)
1. Affirming science and peer-review publishing.
Talley CR
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 May; 66(10):896. PubMed ID: 19420307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review.
Hershey DR
Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6233):424. PubMed ID: 2755503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can journals influence science?
Maddox J
Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6227):657. PubMed ID: 2739710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Critiquing the peer review process: examining a potential dual role conflict.
Houlihan D; Hofschulte L; Sachau D; Patten C
Am Psychol; 1992 Dec; 47(12):1679-81. PubMed ID: 1476331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. French ethics panel warns of 'crisis' in science reporting.
Butler D
Nature; 1995 Jul; 376(6536):108. PubMed ID: 7603550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A look inside the Pharos review process.
Harris ED
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2003; 66(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 12838637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Statements from the Vancouver Group. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
BMJ; 1989 Dec; 299(6712):1394-5. PubMed ID: 2513976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidentiality of referees.
Case M
Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6563):292. PubMed ID: 8552169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Authors have rights too.
Lawrence DJ
BMJ; 1993 Mar; 306(6879):717. PubMed ID: 8471940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science, the icon, versus science, the method. Quis custodes ipsos custodet? (juvenal/satires).
Weinstein S
Int J Neurosci; 1990 Dec; 55(2-4):61-70. PubMed ID: 2084051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The refereed journal: prestige in professional publication.
Clayton BC; Boyle K
Nurs Outlook; 1981 Sep; 29(9):531-4. PubMed ID: 6912449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mergers in the publishing industry.
Lipscomb CE
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 2001 Jul; 89(3):307-8. PubMed ID: 11465692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Journalistic rights, and wrongs.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 1999 Sep; 99(9):7. PubMed ID: 10489568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality filters in medical publications.
Balasubramanian S; Bhaskar PA
J Indian Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 82(11):420-1. PubMed ID: 6399064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is open-access publishing the wave of the future in science?
Pierce GN
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2014 May; 92(5):iii. PubMed ID: 24784474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Duplicate publication].
Lorette G
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1993; 120(3):207-8. PubMed ID: 8239357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
