These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1942127)

  • 1. Computer tomography (CT) applications in implant dentistry.
    James RA; Lozada JL; Truitt HP
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 1942127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of CT generated model with its mandibular and maxillary bone; 2: In vivo study utilizing rasterstereographic technique.
    Harris DD; Ismail YH; Misch C; Zaki HS
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1989; 6(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2519534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CAD/CAM subperiosteal implants in Australia. Case report.
    Fischer JE
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Aug; 38(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 8110228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term retrospective studies on the CT-scan, CAD/CAM, one-stage surgery hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal implants, including human functional retrievals.
    Benjamin LS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):77-93; discussion 94-5. PubMed ID: 1310663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized tomography for implant treatment planning.
    Amet EM
    J Kans Dent Assoc; 1998; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 9800552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Select uses of the subperiosteal implant.
    Benjamin LS
    Dent Implantol Update; 1994 Feb; 5(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 7919412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Helical CT scanning for CAD/CAM subperiosteal implant construction.
    Stoler A
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):247-57. PubMed ID: 9524503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical incorporation of computed tomography into daily implant treatment planning.
    Caldwell CS
    Tex Dent J; 2005 Apr; 122(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 15984368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphologic replication of the mandible using computerized tomography for the fabrication of a subperiosteal implant.
    Truitt HP; James RA; Lindley PE; Boyne P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 3287255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term clinical experience and statistical analysis of CAT scan subperiosteal implants at Loma Linda University.
    Lozada JL
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 8957886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CAD-CAM multiplanar diagnostic imaging for subperiosteal implants.
    Golec TS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Jan; 30(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 3456935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology.
    Williams MY; Mealey BL; Hallmon WW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 1289264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of computerized tomography (CT) generated model with its mandibular and maxillary bone; 1: In vitro study utilizing dry mandibles.
    Zahed TN; Zaki HS; Ismail YH; Curtin H; Misch C
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1989; 6(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 2519533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The subperiosteal implant as a viable long-term treatment modality in the severely atrophied mandible: a patient's 40-year case history.
    Kurtzman GM; Schwartz K
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 7473869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of stereolithography to subperiosteal implant manufacture.
    McAllister ML
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 9835835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixed implant rehabilitation for the edentulous maxilla.
    Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 1813400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technique for mounting computer-generated models for subperiosteal implants: the Brookdate tube and Stylus Centric System.
    Cranin AN; Klein M; Sirakian A
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 2074592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Customised instrument to retract alveolar subperiosteal flap during the placement of dental implants: new technique.
    Vadepally AK
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 55(8):855-856. PubMed ID: 28844571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of laser technology (Er;Cr:YSGG) and stereolithography to aid in the placement of a subperiosteal implant: case study.
    Kusek ER
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 19288882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Problems associated with the atrophic mandible.
    Worthington P; Rubenstein JE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):129-60. PubMed ID: 9421674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.