These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19421360)

  • 1. The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists: The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology.
    Opthof T; Wilde AA
    Neth Heart J; 2009 Apr; 17(4):145-54. PubMed ID: 19421360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bibliometric data in clinical cardiology revisited. The case of 37 Dutch professors.
    Opthof T; Wilde AA
    Neth Heart J; 2011 May; 19(5):246-55. PubMed ID: 21526387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the relationship between citations of publication output and Hirsch index h of authors: conceptualization of tapered Hirsch index h(T), circular citation area radius R and citation acceleration a.
    Sangwal K
    Scientometrics; 2012 Dec; 93(3):987-1004. PubMed ID: 23162174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific output quality of 40 globally top-ranked medical researchers in the field of osteoporosis.
    Pluskiewicz W; Drozdzowska B; Adamczyk P; Noga K
    Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Mar; 13(1):35. PubMed ID: 29582219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arbitrariness of bibliometric parameters: a case study on leading scientists in the German Society for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (DGPT).
    Fox LC; Seifert R
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38864907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists.
    Petersen AM; Stanley HE; Succi S
    Sci Rep; 2011; 1():181. PubMed ID: 22355696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Publication pressure and citation stress; the influence of achievement indicators on scientific practice].
    Tijdink JK; de Rijcke S; Vinkers CH; Smulders YM; Wouters P
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 158():A7147. PubMed ID: 24642121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.
    Ioannidis JP; Klavans R; Boyack KW
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Jul; 14(7):e1002501. PubMed ID: 27367269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Impact factor and/or Hirsch index?].
    Gracza T; Somoskövi I
    Orv Hetil; 2007 May; 148(18):849-52. PubMed ID: 17468068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of scientometric parameters for the evaluation of scientific contributions.
    Klaić B
    Coll Antropol; 1999 Dec; 23(2):751-70. PubMed ID: 10646253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three dimensions of scientific impact.
    Siudem G; Żogała-Siudem B; Cena A; Gagolewski M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(25):13896-13900. PubMed ID: 32513724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The science-meter indicators (citation index, impact factor, Hirsch-index) and the evaluation of the scientific activity in medicine].
    Sýkorová J; Turynová M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2007 Aug; 72(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 17966615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On Track to Professorship? A Bibliometric Analysis of Early Scholarly Output.
    Milone MT; Bernstein J
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2016; 45(3):E119-23. PubMed ID: 26991577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two New Factors for the Evaluation of Scientific Performance:
    Uzbay T
    Turk J Pharm Sci; 2019 Mar; 16(1):115-118. PubMed ID: 32454704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are you in top 1% (1‰)?
    Kosmulski M
    Scientometrics; 2018; 114(2):557-565. PubMed ID: 29449750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "Mendel syndrome" in science: durability of scientific literature and its effects on bibliometric analysis of individual scientists.
    Costas R; van Leeuwen TN; van Raan AF
    Scientometrics; 2011 Oct; 89(1):177-205. PubMed ID: 21957319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama].
    La Torre G; Sciarra I; Chiappetta M; Monteduro A
    Clin Ter; 2017; 168(2):e65-e71. PubMed ID: 28383616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are Quantitative Measures of Academic Productivity Correlated with Academic Rank in Plastic Surgery? A National Study.
    Susarla SM; Lopez J; Swanson EW; Miller D; O'Brien-Coon D; Zins JE; Serletti JM; Yaremchuk MJ; Manson PN; Gordon CR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Sep; 136(3):613-621. PubMed ID: 26313830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact factor and other indices to assess science, scientists and scientific journals.
    Satyanarayana K
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010; 54(3):197-212. PubMed ID: 21409860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.