470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19423064)
1. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: surgical and survival outcomes.
Fader AN; Michener CM; Frasure HE; Giannios N; Belinson JL; Zanotti KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 19423064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Bergamini V; Uccella S; Beretta P; Franchi M; Bolis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 16527713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature.
Gil-Moreno A; Díaz-Feijoo B; Morchón S; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16431320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges.
Gemignani ML; Curtin JP; Zelmanovich J; Patel DA; Venkatraman E; Barakat RR
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10094872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome.
Kalogiannidis I; Lambrechts S; Amant F; Neven P; Van Gorp T; Vergote I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):248.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17346541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrence and survival.
Obermair A; Manolitsas TP; Leung Y; Hammond IG; McCartney AJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Mar; 92(3):789-93. PubMed ID: 14984942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival.
Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without lymph node dissection for uterine neoplasia.
O'Hanlan KA; Pinto RA; O'Holleran M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 17630162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of three subcategories of laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Rong CH; Shen K; Lang JH; Yang JX; Wu M; Pan LY; Leng JH
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2007 Jun; 29(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 17633474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients.
Stepanian AA; Miklos JR; Moore RD; Mattox TF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18312989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Yoon BS; Seong SJ; Kim IH; Song T; Kim ML; Kim MK
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):486-9. PubMed ID: 25510688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Muzii L; Basile S; Zupi E; Marconi D; Zullo MA; Manci N; Bellati F; Angioli R; Benedetti Panici P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 17848323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal vs. abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer stage 1.
Tollund L; Hansen B; Kjer JJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1138-41. PubMed ID: 16929423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
