441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19423089)
1. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers.
Rajan R; Cainer KE
Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(2):784-95. PubMed ID: 18485606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.
Cooke M; Lu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2059-69. PubMed ID: 20968376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.
Cooke M; Garcia Lecumberri ML; Barker J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):414-27. PubMed ID: 18177170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A model for multitalker speech perception.
Srinivasan S; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3213-24. PubMed ID: 19045805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human phoneme recognition depending on speech-intrinsic variability.
Meyer BT; Jürgens T; Wesker T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3126-41. PubMed ID: 21110608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deviance detection in congruent audiovisual speech: evidence for implicit integrated audiovisual memory representations.
Winkler I; Horváth J; Weisz J; Trejo LJ
Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 19733617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tune in or tune out: age-related differences in listening to speech in music.
Russo FA; Pichora-Fuller MK
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):746-60. PubMed ID: 18596643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating the influence of continuous babble on auditory short-term memory performance.
Heinrich A; Schneider BA; Craik FI
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):735-51. PubMed ID: 17853231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of priming on release from informational masking is equivalent for younger and older adults.
Ezzatian P; Li L; Pichora-Fuller K; Schneider B
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 21178568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries.
Mattys SL; Melhorn JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):554-67. PubMed ID: 17614511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise.
Rönnberg J; Rudner M; Lunner T; Zekveld AA
Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):263-9. PubMed ID: 20871181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
Rao MD; Letowski T
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
