73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19423207)
1. [Evaluation of 3D numerisation with structured light projection in breast surgery].
Sinna R; Garson S; Taha F; Benhaim T; Carton C; Delay E; Robbe M
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2009 Aug; 54(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 19423207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [3D evaluation and mammary augmentation surgery].
Garson S; Delay E; Sinna R; Delaporte T; Robbe M; Carton S
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2005 Oct; 50(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16181717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty.
Small KH; Tepper OM; Unger JG; Kumar N; Feldman DL; Choi M; Karp NS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 19091641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Udosic K; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 17122543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months.
Eder M; v Waldenfels F; Sichtermann M; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Biemer E; Kovacs L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1152-60. PubMed ID: 21550866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Three-dimensional breast non-contact measurement].
Zha XP; DU F; Gao JH; Li SH; Jiang P; Liu SF; Lian YF
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Mar; 25(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 15771988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Tepper OM; Small K; Rudolph L; Choi M; Karp N
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):548-51. PubMed ID: 16978973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty.
Esme DL; Bucksch A; Beekman WH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18982384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The stable status evaluation for female breast implant surgery by calculating related physics parameters.
Sun SP; Hsu KW; Chen JS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 May; 90(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 18164780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining the kinetics of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty.
Choi M; Unger J; Small K; Tepper O; Kumar N; Feldman D; Karp N
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 19387153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital evaluation of breast symmetry with 3D scanning technique].
Liu CJ; Ji K; Sun JJ; Xin MQ; Mu DL; Mu LH; Luan J
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 29(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 24409777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment.
Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast asymmetry: a new vision of this malformation.
Onesti MG; Mezzana P; Martano A; Scuderi N
Acta Chir Plast; 2004; 46(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 15274471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging.
Eder M; Waldenfels FV; Swobodnik A; Klöppel M; Pape AK; Schuster T; Raith S; Kitzler E; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Kovacs L
Breast; 2012 Apr; 21(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 21849246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chances and limitations of a low-cost mobile 3D scanner for breast imaging in comparison to an established 3D photogrammetric system.
Koban KC; Härtnagl F; Titze V; Schenck TL; Giunta RE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Oct; 71(10):1417-1423. PubMed ID: 29970344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three dimensional measurement of rhinoplasty results.
van Heerbeek N; Ingels KJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Bergé SJ
Rhinology; 2009 Jun; 47(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 19593965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Custom-made Reduction Mammaplasty.
Tarallo M; Monarca C; Rizzo MI; Cigna E; Scuderi N
In Vivo; 2009; 23(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 19779126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
