These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19423257)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy.
    Liang X; Lambrichts I; Sun Y; Denis K; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 19423257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
    Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method.
    Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new method to assess the accuracy of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanner by using a non-contact reverse engineering technique.
    Martorelli M; Ausiello P; Morrone R
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 24412585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
    Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multi Slice Computed Tomography Image Quality of Human Dried Mandible using 10 Anatomical Landmarks.
    Saati S; Kaveh F; Yarmohammadi S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Feb; 11(2):ZC13-ZC16. PubMed ID: 28384972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
    Loubele M; Maes F; Schutyser F; Marchal G; Jacobs R; Suetens P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 16876067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
    Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
    Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners.
    Loubele M; Jacobs R; Maes F; Denis K; White S; Coudyzer W; Lambrichts I; van Steenberghe D; Suetens P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):309-18. PubMed ID: 18757715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
    Hirschinger V; Hanke S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):152-60, 162-3. PubMed ID: 25744093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segmentation process significantly influences the accuracy of 3D surface models derived from cone beam computed tomography.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Schepers RH; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e524-30. PubMed ID: 21733649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on multi-slice and cone beam computed tomography scans to detect the mandibular canal during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
    Freire-Maia B; Machado VD; Valerio CS; Custódio AL; Manzi FR; Junqueira JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 46(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 27939592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation--a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones.
    Theunisse HJ; Joemai RM; Maal TJ; Geleijns J; Mylanus EA; Verbist BM
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 25420084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.