These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19423423)

  • 1. Automatic modeling of acoustic perception of breathiness in pathological voices.
    Castillo-Guerra E; Ruíz A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):932-40. PubMed ID: 19423423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards objective evaluation of perceived roughness and breathiness: an approach based on mel-frequency cepstral analysis.
    Sáenz-Lechón N; Fraile R; Godino-Llorente JI; Fernández-Baíllo R; Osma-Ruiz V; Gutiérrez-Arriola JM; Arias-Londoño JD
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 20849245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
    Bhuta T; Patrick L; Garnett JD
    J Voice; 2004 Sep; 18(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15331102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vocal Characteristics of Elderly Women Engaged in Aerobics in Private Institutions of Salvador, Bahia.
    Colman Machado de Machado F; Cielo CA; Lessa MM; Barbosa LH
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e9-19. PubMed ID: 25795360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
    Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
    Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual and Quantitative Assessment of Dysphonia Across Vowel Categories.
    Anand S; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R; Eddins DA
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):473-481. PubMed ID: 29804803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech.
    Hillenbrand J; Houde RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 8729919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic parameters for classification of breathiness in continuous speech according to the GRBAS scale.
    Stráník A; Čmejla R; Vokřál J
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):653.e9-653.e17. PubMed ID: 24755168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates.
    Eddins DA; Anand S; Camacho A; Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):774.e1-774.e7. PubMed ID: 26775221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative acoustic measurements for characterization of speech and voice disorders in early untreated Parkinson's disease.
    Rusz J; Cmejla R; Ruzickova H; Ruzicka E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):350-67. PubMed ID: 21303016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.