219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19423485)
1. [Validation of surrogate endpoints in digestive oncology].
Methy N; Bedenne L; Bonnetain F
Bull Cancer; 2009 May; 96(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 19423485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the decision in a validation process of a surrogate endpoint change with level of significance of treatment effect? A proposal on validation of surrogate endpoints.
Sertdemir Y; Burgut R
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Jan; 30(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18809512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of meta-analysis for the validation of surrogate endpoints and biomarkers in cancer trials.
Buyse M
Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 19826362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Surrogate endpoints].
Hill C
Bull Cancer; 1999; 86(7-8):622-4. PubMed ID: 10477379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simple meta-analytic approach for using a binary surrogate endpoint to predict the effect of intervention on true endpoint.
Baker SG
Biostatistics; 2006 Jan; 7(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 15972889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints?
Berger VW
Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1571-8. PubMed ID: 15122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two simple approaches for validating a binary surrogate endpoint using data from multiple trials.
Baker SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 18285436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in digestive oncology trials: which candidates? A questionnaires survey among clinicians and methodologists.
Methy N; Bedenne L; Bonnetain F
BMC Cancer; 2010 Jun; 10():277. PubMed ID: 20537166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interim futility analysis with intermediate endpoints.
Goldman B; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18283075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a clinician's perspective.
Piedbois P; Miller Croswell J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):519-27. PubMed ID: 18285441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual- and trial-level surrogacy in colorectal cancer.
Buyse M; Burzykowski T; Michiels S; Carroll K
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 18285439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A unified framework for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in mental-health clinical trials.
Molenberghs G; Burzykowski T; Alonso A; Assam P; Tilahun A; Buyse M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2010 Jun; 19(3):205-36. PubMed ID: 19608602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in early colorectal cancer from the clinician's perspective.
Grothey A
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 18285442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Larynx preservation clinical trial design: key issues and recommendations-a consensus panel summary.
Lefebvre JL; Ang KK;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1293-303. PubMed ID: 19306746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A two-stage procedure for survival studies with surrogate endpoints.
Flandre P; O'Quigley J
Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):969-76. PubMed ID: 7548712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternate endpoints for screening phase II studies.
Dhani N; Tu D; Sargent DJ; Seymour L; Moore MJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1873-82. PubMed ID: 19276273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Health related quality of life and endpoints in oncology].
Bonnetain F
Cancer Radiother; 2010 Oct; 14(6-7):515-8. PubMed ID: 20674446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Larynx preservation clinical trial design: key issues and recommendations--a consensus panel summary.
Lefebvre JL; Ang KK;
Head Neck; 2009 Apr; 31(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 19283793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating time to cancer recurrence as a surrogate marker for survival from an information theory perspective.
Alonso A; Molenberghs G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 18285443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
