146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19424702)
1. A novel method for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) evaluation of digital mammography detectors.
Baldelli P; Phelan N; Egan G
Eur Radiol; 2009 Sep; 19(9):2275-85. PubMed ID: 19424702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of detector uniformity issues for Siemens Inspiration systems.
Baldelli P; Keavey E; Manley M; Power G; Phelan N
Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():262-268. PubMed ID: 31927263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [First experiments for the detection of simulated mammographic lesions: digital full field mammography with a new detector with a double plate of pure selenium].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Adamietz B; Lell M; Anders K; Uder M
Radiologe; 2011 Feb; 51(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 21069512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic technique parameter selection on a digital mammography system: an evaluation of SNR and CNR as a function of AGD on a GE senographe DS.
Thomson FJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Sep; 29(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17058586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors.
Ghetti C; Borrini A; Ortenzia O; Rossi R; Ordóñez PL
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 18383665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities.
Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Diaz O; Young KC
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121901. PubMed ID: 25471961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photon counting computed tomography: concept and initial results.
Shikhaliev PM; Xu T; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):427-36. PubMed ID: 15789589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of effective detective quantum efficiency for a photon counting scanning mammography system and comparison with two flat panel full-field digital mammography systems.
Wood TJ; Moore CS; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025025. PubMed ID: 29260730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors.
Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1918-25. PubMed ID: 17654894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of dual-energy subtraction of digital mammography images under conditions found in a commercial unit.
Brandan ME; Ramírez-R V
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2307-20. PubMed ID: 16625044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation of a retrofit digital detector-based mammography system.
Marshall NW; van Ongeval C; Bosmans H
Phys Med; 2016 Feb; 32(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 26803225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose reduction using a CdZnTe-based computed tomography system: comparison to flat-panel detectors.
Le Huy Q; Ducote JL; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1225-36. PubMed ID: 20384260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
