These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19424919)

  • 1. Main peak interleaved sampling (MPIS) strategy: effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant.
    Di Lella F; Bacciu A; Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Guida M; Bacciu S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 19424919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: Comparison between Digisonic® Convex and Digisonic® SP devices after a 1-year follow-up.
    Lazard DS; Bordure P; Lina-Granade G; Magnan J; Meller R; Meyer B; Radafy E; Roux PE; Gnansia D; Péan V; Truy E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Nov; 130(11):1267-73. PubMed ID: 20446821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Büchner C; Gaertner L; Stoever T; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 19479460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.
    Bonnard D; Lautissier S; Bosset-Audoit A; Coriat G; Beraha M; Maunoury A; Martel J; Darrouzet V; Bébéar JP; Dauman R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 23548561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The Clarion cochlear implant--technical principles, initial clinical experiences and results].
    Lenarz T; Battmer RD
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8851112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.
    Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech performance and sound localization abilities in Neurelec Digisonic® SP binaural cochlear implant users.
    Verhaert N; Lazard DS; Gnansia D; Bébéar JP; Romanet P; Meyer B; Péan V; Mollard D; Truy E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 22584289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
    Hamzavi J; Pok SM; Gstoettner W; Baumgartner WD
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Feb; 43(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 15035557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra-individual assessment of speech and music perception in cochlear implant users with contralateral Cochlear™ and MED-EL™ systems.
    Harris RL; Gibson WP; Johnson M; Brew J; Bray M; Psarros C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 131(12):1270-8. PubMed ID: 22074105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.