These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19425635)
21. A multiple-frequency hydrophone calibration technique. Smith RA; Bacon DR J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2231-43. PubMed ID: 2189922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Voltage sensitivity response of ultrasonic hydrophones in the frequency range 0.25-2.5 MHz. Lewin PA; Bautista R; Devaraju V Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Sep; 25(7):1131-7. PubMed ID: 10574344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Determination of sensitivity versus frequency characteristics of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones below 1 MHz using planar scanning technique. Devaraju V; Lewin PA; Bleeker H J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Mar; 21(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 11883536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of disposable membrane hydrophones for a frequency range from 1MHz to 10MHz. Lee JW; Ohm WS; Kim YT Ultrasonics; 2017 Nov; 81():50-58. PubMed ID: 28578220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Practicalities of Obtaining and Using Hydrophone Calibration Data to Derive Pressure Waveforms. Hurrell AM; Rajagopal S IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):126-140. PubMed ID: 27479961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Comparison of Different Calibration Techniques for Hydrophones Used in Medical Ultrasonic Field Measurement. Weber M; Wilkens V IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 May; 68(5):1919-1929. PubMed ID: 33360988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determination of sewer roughness and sediment properties using acoustic techniques. Horoshenkov KV; Ashley RN; Blanksby J Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 12636066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimating marine sediment attenuation at low frequency with a vertical line array. Jiang YM; Chapman NR; Yang K; Ma Y J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):EL158-63. PubMed ID: 19354355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Time delay spectrometry for hydrophone calibrations below 1 MHz. Gammell PM; Harris GR J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):L41-6. PubMed ID: 10573913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Observations of the R reflector and sediment interface reflection at the Shallow Water '06 Central Site. Choi JW; Dahl PH; Goff JA J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 19045554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cymbal piezoelectric composite underwater acoustic transducer. Li D; Wu M; Oyang P; Xu X Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e685-7. PubMed ID: 16793099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determination of the receiving range of sound field measurements in cavitating media. Koch C; Jenderka KV Ultrason Sonochem; 2008 Jul; 15(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 18065253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nominal Versus Actual Spatial Resolution: Comparison of Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size for Membrane, Needle, Capsule, and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones. Wear KA; Shah A IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 Feb; 70(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 36178990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Development of the Differential MEMS Vector Hydrophone. Zhang G; Liu M; Shen N; Wang X; Zhang W Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28594384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones. Wear K; Liu Y; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Harris GR IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Jan; 62(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 25585399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]