These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19425642)

  • 1. Subjective evaluation of heavy-weight floor impact sounds in relation to spatial characteristics.
    Jeon JY; Lee PJ; Kim JH; Yoo SY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):2987-94. PubMed ID: 19425642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of temporal decay on perception of heavy-weight floor impact sounds.
    Kim JH; Ryu JK; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2730-8. PubMed ID: 24116411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the standard rubber ball as an impact source with heavyweight concrete floors.
    Jeon JY; Lee PJ; Sato S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):167-78. PubMed ID: 19603874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
    Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective and objective evaluations of a scattered sound field in a scale model opera house.
    Ryu JK; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1538-49. PubMed ID: 19045645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Background Noise, Noise Sensitivity, and Attitudes towards Neighbours, and a Subjective Experiment Using a Rubber Ball Impact Sound.
    Jeong J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34300019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The responses of subjective feeling, task performance ability, cortisol and HRV for the various types of floor impact sound: a pilot study.
    Yun SH; Park SJ; Sim CS; Sung JH; Kim A; Lee JM; Lee SH; Lee J
    Ann Occup Environ Med; 2017; 29():13. PubMed ID: 28515946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sound Quality Factors Inducing the Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response.
    Shimokura R
    Audiol Res; 2022 Oct; 12(5):574-584. PubMed ID: 36285913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear multivariate evaluation models for spatial perception of soundscape.
    Deng Z; Kang J; Wang D; Liu A; Kang JZ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2860-70. PubMed ID: 26627762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proportion of effects by head-related transfer function and receiver position variation to interaural cross-correlation values.
    Pätynen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):EL579. PubMed ID: 28679244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Just noticeable differences of spatial cues in echoic and anechoic acoustical environments.
    Klockgether S; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):EL352. PubMed ID: 27794310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective and subjective evaluations of twenty-three opera houses in Europe, Japan, and the Americas.
    Hidaka T; Beranek LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):368-83. PubMed ID: 10641646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective Annoyance Response to Diesel Engine Sound During Idling Conditions.
    Shafiquzzaman Khan M; Johansson Ö; Sundbäck U
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 1996 Jan; 2(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 10602574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A- and C-weighted sound levels as predictors of the annoyance caused by shooting sounds, for various façade attenuation types.
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):336-47. PubMed ID: 12558273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Looming sounds as warning signals: the function of motion cues.
    Bach DR; Neuhoff JG; Perrig W; Seifritz E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19615414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the static compressive load on vibration propagation in multistory buildings and resulting heavyweight floor impact sounds.
    Kwak Y; Lee S; Park J; Hwang D; Jeon JY; Park J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):308. PubMed ID: 28764414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimized reference spectrum for rating the impact sound insulation of concrete floors.
    Kylliäinen M; Virjonen P; Hongisto V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):407. PubMed ID: 30710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.