295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19425669)
1. Results of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency interlaboratory comparison of American National Standards Institute S12.6-1997 Methods A and B.
Murphy WJ; Byrne DC; Gauger D; Ahroon WA; Berger E; Gerges SN; McKinley R; Witt B; Krieg EF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3262-77. PubMed ID: 19425669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter-laboratory comparison of three earplug fit-test systems.
Byrne DC; Murphy WJ; Krieg EF; Ghent RM; Michael KL; Stefanson EW; Ahroon WA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Apr; 14(4):294-305. PubMed ID: 27786602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance.
Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Harris DA; Johnson JL; Shaw PB
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 12908866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.
Murphy WJ; Franks JR; Berger EH; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Krieg EF; Mozo BT; Royster JD; Royster LH; Simon SD; Stephenson C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):311-23. PubMed ID: 14759024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation.
Murphy WJ; Stephenson MR; Byrne DC; Witt B; Duran J
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):132-41. PubMed ID: 21368438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data.
Berger EH; Franks JR; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Kieper RW; Merry CJ; Mozo BT; Nixon CW; Ohlin D; Royster JD; Royster LH
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):665-72. PubMed ID: 9479749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four earplugs in search of a rating system.
Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Johnson JL; Harris DA
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 10890730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
Abel SM; Odell P
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attenuation of hearing protectors at 85 dB SPL investigated by commercial "insertion gain" method.
Woxen O; Borchgrevink HM
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1991; 34():145-55. PubMed ID: 1842461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The high, medium, and low method--a better noise reduction rating?
Behar A
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Dec; 51(12):659-62. PubMed ID: 2270834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in hearing protector usage in American manufacturing from 1972 to 1989.
Davis RR; Sieber WK
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Oct; 59(10):715-22. PubMed ID: 9794069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
Villchur E; Killion MC
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of training format on earplug performance.
Joseph A; Punch J; Stephenson M; Paneth N; Wolfe E; Murphy W
Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):609-18. PubMed ID: 17922350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gender differences in real-world hearing protector attenuation.
Abel SM; Alberti PW; Rokas D
J Otolaryngol; 1988 Apr; 17(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 3385873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance.
Voix J; Laville F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3722-32. PubMed ID: 19507954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the use of occupational standards for controlling toxic air pollutants.
Rowan CA; Connolly WM; Brown HS
J Environ Sci Health B; 1984 Oct; 19(7):611-48. PubMed ID: 6438217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attenuation characteristics of an extended-wear hearing aid: Impulse and continuous noise.
Brungart DS; Spencer NJ; Pryor N; Abouzahra N; McKenna EA; Iyer N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1404. PubMed ID: 33003895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
