These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19425970)

  • 1. Competition versus cooperation: success of individuals foraging alone and in groups.
    Ranta E; Rita H; Lindstrom K
    Am Nat; 1993 Jul; 142(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 19425970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of spatial food distribution and group size on foraging behaviour in a benthic fish.
    Stenberg M; Persson A
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15908140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of position and flock size on vigilance and foraging behaviour of the scaled dove Columbina squammata.
    Dias RI
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 16860945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competition in a group of equal foragers.
    Rita H; Ranta E
    Am Nat; 1998 Jul; 152(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 18811402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further experimental analysis of the social learning and transmission of foraging information amongst Norway rats.
    Laland KN; Plotkin HC
    Behav Processes; 1992; 27(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 24896467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of dispersed central-place foraging: an individual-based model of a polydomous ant colony.
    Schmolke A
    Am Nat; 2009 Jun; 173(6):772-8. PubMed ID: 19341351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pairs of fish resolve conflicts over coordinated movement by taking turns.
    Harcourt JL; Sweetman G; Manica A; Johnstone RA
    Curr Biol; 2010 Jan; 20(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20079643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of foraging in small groups: An experimental study on public information use in red knots Calidris canutus.
    Bijleveld AI; van Gils JA; Jouta J; Piersma T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Aug; 117():74-81. PubMed ID: 25218106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs.
    Rands SA; Cowlishaw G; Pettifor RA; Rowcliffe JM; Johnstone RA
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6938):432-4. PubMed ID: 12761547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) do not utilize social information in three simultaneous social foraging tasks.
    Voelkl B; Huber L
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 16969636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Group size effects on foraging and vigilance in migratory Tibetan antelope.
    Lian X; Zhang T; Cao Y; Su J; Thirgood S
    Behav Processes; 2007 Nov; 76(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 17582704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal foraging for multiple resources in several food species.
    Hengeveld GM; van Langevelde F; Groen TA; de Knegt HJ
    Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 19422320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonation behavior of cooperatively foraging spinner dolphins.
    Benoit-Bird KJ; Au WW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):539-46. PubMed ID: 19173439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The regulation of foraging activity in red harvester ant colonies.
    Gordon DM
    Am Nat; 2002 May; 159(5):509-18. PubMed ID: 18707433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slow-exploring captive red knots were quicker to find food in a social setting than fast explorers.
    Roncoroni A; Ersoy S; Bijleveld AI
    Biol Lett; 2024 Jul; 20(7):20240139. PubMed ID: 39046288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A game theoretical model of the evolution of food hoarding: applications to the Paridae.
    Smulders TV
    Am Nat; 1998 Apr; 151(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 18811326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are stress hormone levels a good proxy of foraging success? An experiment with king penguins, Aptenodytes patagonicus.
    Angelier F; Giraudeau M; Bost CA; Le Bouard F; Chastel O
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Sep; 212(17):2824-9. PubMed ID: 19684217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial-concentration effects and the importance of local enhancement in the evolution of colonial breeding in seabirds.
    Buckley NJ
    Am Nat; 1997 Jun; 149(6):1091-112. PubMed ID: 18811265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapes.
    Grünbaum D
    Am Nat; 1998 Feb; 151(2):97-113. PubMed ID: 18811411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Everybody loses: intraspecific competition induces tragedy of the commons in Allenby's gerbils.
    Berger-Tal O; Embar K; Kotler BP; Saltz D
    Ecology; 2015 Jan; 96(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 26236890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.