These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19426963)

  • 21. Alternative computer mouse designs: performance, posture, and subjective evaluations for college students aged 18-25.
    Feathers DJ; Rollings K; Hedge A
    Work; 2013; 44 Suppl 1():S115-22. PubMed ID: 23241688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment.
    Baldus T; Patterson P
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 18295185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enabling devices, empowering people: the design and evaluation of Trackball EdgeWrite.
    Wobbrock JO; Myers BA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Jan; 3(1):35-56. PubMed ID: 18416517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pointing device usage guidelines for people with quadriplegia: a simulation and validation study utilizing an integrated pointing device apparatus.
    Chen HC; Chen CL; Lu CC; Wu CY
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Jun; 17(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19423450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of tooth-click triggering and speech recognition in assistive technology for computer access.
    Simpson T; Gauthier M; Prochazka A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2010 Feb; 24(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 19679651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ergonomics of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    Hanna GB; Elamass M; Cuschieri A
    Semin Laparosc Surg; 2001 Jun; 8(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 11441397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing mouse alternatives to access to computer: a case study of a user with cerebral palsy.
    Pousada T; Pareira J; Groba B; Nieto L; Pazos A
    Assist Technol; 2014; 26(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 24800452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brain-computer interface (BCI) operation: signal and noise during early training sessions.
    McFarland DJ; Sarnacki WA; Vaughan TM; Wolpaw JR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 15589184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Brain-computer interfaces for 1-D and 2-D cursor control: designs using volitional control of the EEG spectrum or steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Trejo LJ; Rosipal R; Matthews B
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Jun; 14(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 16792300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Design and evaluation of a curved computer keyboard.
    McLoone HE; Jacobson M; Clark P; Opina R; Hegg C; Johnson P
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1529-39. PubMed ID: 19941185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Design and feasibility study of an integrated pointing device apparatus for individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Chen HC; Liu YP; Chen CL; Chen CY
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 16908006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Design methodology for a novel multifunction laparoscopic tool: engineering for surgeons' needs.
    Nelson CA; Miller DJ; Oleynikov D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():343-8. PubMed ID: 17377300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding perceptual boundaries in laparoscopic surgery.
    Lamata P; Gomez EJ; Hernández FL; Oltra Pastor A; Sanchez-Margallo FM; Del Pozo Guerrero F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):866-73. PubMed ID: 18334378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can augmented force feedback facilitate virtual target acquisition tasks?
    Houtsma AJ; Keuning H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():207-12. PubMed ID: 16404046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physical workload during use of speech recognition and traditional computer input devices.
    Juul-Kristensen B; Laursen B; Pilegaard M; Jensen BR
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 14660208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ergonomic design criteria for a novel laparoscopic tool handle with tactile feedback.
    Mårvik R; Nesbakken R; Langø T; Yavuz Y; Vanhauwaert Bjelland H; Ottermo MV; Stavdahl O
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 17159752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ergonomic investigation of weight distribution of laparoscopic instruments.
    Lin CJ; Chen HJ; Lo YC
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Jun; 21(5):411-5. PubMed ID: 21561326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of four types of non-obtrusive feedback on computer behaviour, task performance and comfort.
    de Korte EM; Huysmans MA; de Jong AM; van de Ven JG; Ruijsendaal M
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Mar; 43(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 21726853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of user age and target-expansion methods on target-acquisition tasks using a mouse.
    Lee D; Kwon S; Chung MK
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 21658676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of platform motion and target orientation on the performance of trackball manipulation.
    Yau YJ; Chao CJ; Feng WY; Hwang SL
    Ergonomics; 2011 Aug; 54(8):745-54. PubMed ID: 21846312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.