These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19427374)

  • 1. Discrimination of auditory gratings in birds.
    Osmanski MS; Marvit P; Depireux DA; Dooling RJ
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):11-20. PubMed ID: 19427374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The discrimination of temporal fine structure in call-like harmonic sounds by birds.
    Lohr B; Dooling RJ; Bartone S
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 16893261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial unmasking of birdsong in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Dent ML; McClaine EM; Best V; Ozmeral E; Narayan R; Gallun FJ; Sen K; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 19929104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of complex sounds in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) with temporary hearing loss.
    Dooling RJ; Ryals BM; Dent ML; Reid TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2524-32. PubMed ID: 16642864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cues for auditory stream segregation of birdsong in budgerigars and zebra finches: Effects of location, timing, amplitude, and frequency.
    Dent ML; Martin AK; Flaherty MM; Neilans EG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):674-83. PubMed ID: 26936551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of auditory distance cues by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Radziwon KE; Welch TE; Cone JP; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3384-92. PubMed ID: 21568439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of changes in timbre and harmonicity in complex sounds by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Lohr B; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 1998 Mar; 112(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 9528113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Species differences in the identification of acoustic stimuli by birds.
    Dent ML; Welch TE; McClaine EM; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18164143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of distance calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata): assessing species-specific advantages.
    Okanoya K; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 1991 Mar; 105(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 2032457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masked auditory thresholds in three species of birds, as measured by the auditory brainstem response (L).
    Noirot IC; Brittan-Powell EF; Dooling RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3445-8. PubMed ID: 21682367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Franssen effect illusion in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Dent ML; McClaine EM; Welch TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3609-14. PubMed ID: 18247768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.
    Henry KS; Amburgey KN; Abrams KS; Idrobo F; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2073. PubMed ID: 29092534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory perception of conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations in birds: evidence for special processes.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD; Klump GM; Okanoya K
    J Comp Psychol; 1992 Mar; 106(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 1555398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.
    Woolley SM; Fremouw TE; Hsu A; Theunissen FE
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 8(10):1371-9. PubMed ID: 16136039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primate auditory recognition memory performance varies with sound type.
    Ng CW; Plakke B; Poremba A
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19567264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midbrain-Level Neural Correlates of Behavioral Tone-in-Noise Detection: Dependence on Energy and Envelope Cues.
    Wang Y; Abrams KS; Carney LH; Henry KS
    J Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 41(34):7206-7223. PubMed ID: 34266898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative salience of envelope and fine structure cues in zebra finch song.
    Vernaleo BA; Dooling RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3373-83. PubMed ID: 21568438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing sensitivity to shifts of rippled-spectrum patterns.
    Nechaev DI; Supin AY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2913-22. PubMed ID: 24116427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound order discrimination in two species of birds-Taeniopygia guttata and Melopsittacus undulatus.
    Stennette KA; Fishbein A; Prior N; Ball GF; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2023 Feb; 137(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 36931835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals.
    Dooling RJ; Park TJ; Brown SD; Okanoya K; Soli SD
    J Comp Psychol; 1987 Dec; 101(4):367-381. PubMed ID: 3691060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.