BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19427374)

  • 1. Discrimination of auditory gratings in birds.
    Osmanski MS; Marvit P; Depireux DA; Dooling RJ
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):11-20. PubMed ID: 19427374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The discrimination of temporal fine structure in call-like harmonic sounds by birds.
    Lohr B; Dooling RJ; Bartone S
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 16893261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial unmasking of birdsong in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Dent ML; McClaine EM; Best V; Ozmeral E; Narayan R; Gallun FJ; Sen K; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 19929104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of complex sounds in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) with temporary hearing loss.
    Dooling RJ; Ryals BM; Dent ML; Reid TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2524-32. PubMed ID: 16642864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cues for auditory stream segregation of birdsong in budgerigars and zebra finches: Effects of location, timing, amplitude, and frequency.
    Dent ML; Martin AK; Flaherty MM; Neilans EG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):674-83. PubMed ID: 26936551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of auditory distance cues by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Radziwon KE; Welch TE; Cone JP; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3384-92. PubMed ID: 21568439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of changes in timbre and harmonicity in complex sounds by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Lohr B; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 1998 Mar; 112(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 9528113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Species differences in the identification of acoustic stimuli by birds.
    Dent ML; Welch TE; McClaine EM; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18164143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of distance calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata): assessing species-specific advantages.
    Okanoya K; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 1991 Mar; 105(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 2032457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masked auditory thresholds in three species of birds, as measured by the auditory brainstem response (L).
    Noirot IC; Brittan-Powell EF; Dooling RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3445-8. PubMed ID: 21682367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Franssen effect illusion in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Dent ML; McClaine EM; Welch TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3609-14. PubMed ID: 18247768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.
    Henry KS; Amburgey KN; Abrams KS; Idrobo F; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2073. PubMed ID: 29092534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory perception of conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations in birds: evidence for special processes.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD; Klump GM; Okanoya K
    J Comp Psychol; 1992 Mar; 106(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 1555398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.
    Woolley SM; Fremouw TE; Hsu A; Theunissen FE
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 8(10):1371-9. PubMed ID: 16136039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primate auditory recognition memory performance varies with sound type.
    Ng CW; Plakke B; Poremba A
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19567264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midbrain-Level Neural Correlates of Behavioral Tone-in-Noise Detection: Dependence on Energy and Envelope Cues.
    Wang Y; Abrams KS; Carney LH; Henry KS
    J Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 41(34):7206-7223. PubMed ID: 34266898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative salience of envelope and fine structure cues in zebra finch song.
    Vernaleo BA; Dooling RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3373-83. PubMed ID: 21568438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing sensitivity to shifts of rippled-spectrum patterns.
    Nechaev DI; Supin AY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2913-22. PubMed ID: 24116427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound order discrimination in two species of birds-Taeniopygia guttata and Melopsittacus undulatus.
    Stennette KA; Fishbein A; Prior N; Ball GF; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2023 Feb; 137(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 36931835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals.
    Dooling RJ; Park TJ; Brown SD; Okanoya K; Soli SD
    J Comp Psychol; 1987 Dec; 101(4):367-381. PubMed ID: 3691060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.