467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19427717)
1. Requirements for estimation of doses from contaminants dispersed by a 'dirty bomb' explosion in an urban area.
Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1005-11. PubMed ID: 19427717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.
Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Schou-Jensen L; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 18550515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling of the EMRAS urban working group hypothetical scenario using the RESRAD-RDD methodology.
Kamboj S; Cheng JJ; Yu C; Domotor S; Wallo A
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 19403213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rays as weapons.
Vogel H
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Aug; 63(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 17630244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical considerations in the management of combined radiation blast injury casualties caused by a radiological dirty bomb.
Williams G; O'Malley M
Injury; 2010 Sep; 41(9):943-7. PubMed ID: 20149372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Valentin J;
Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ensuring the safety of surgical teams when managing casualties of a radiological dirty bomb.
Williams G; O'Malley M; Nocera A
Injury; 2010 Sep; 41(9):938-42. PubMed ID: 20207355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nuclear security and radiological preparedness for the olympic games, athens 2004: lessons learned for organizing major public events.
Kamenopoulou V; Dimitriou P; Hourdakis CJ; Maltezos A; Matikas T; Potiriadis C; Camarinopoulos L
Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):318-30. PubMed ID: 16966875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Urban meteorological modelling for nuclear emergency preparedness.
Baklanov A; Sørensen JH; Hoe SC; Amstrup B
J Environ Radioact; 2006; 85(2-3):154-70. PubMed ID: 16157431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NARAC: an emergency response resource for predicting the atmospheric dispersion and assessing the consequences of airborne radionuclides.
Bradley MM
J Environ Radioact; 2007; 96(1-3):116-21. PubMed ID: 17507121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
Haywood SM
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Field tests using radioactive matter.
Prouza Z; Beckova V; Cespirova I; Helebrant J; Hulka J; Kuca P; Michalek V; Rulik P; Skrkal J; Hovorka J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 139(4):519-31. PubMed ID: 20089512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of fixatives for response to a radiation dispersal devise attack--a review of the current (2009) state-of-the-art.
Parra RR; Medina VF; Conca JL
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Nov; 100(11):923-34. PubMed ID: 19700226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scenario of a dirty bomb in an urban environment and acute management of radiation poisoning and injuries.
Chin FK
Singapore Med J; 2007 Oct; 48(10):950-7. PubMed ID: 17909684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Danish emergency response model of the atmosphere (DERMA).
Sørensen JH; Baklanov A; Hoe S
J Environ Radioact; 2007; 96(1-3):122-9. PubMed ID: 17481784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A radioactive problem. Some shirk precautions against 'dirty bomb' threat.
Lee J
Mod Healthc; 2012 Sep; 42(38):12. PubMed ID: 23163059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Dirty bomb' threat puts spotlight on unprepared EDs: do you have a plan?
ED Manag; 2002 Sep; 14(9):97-100; suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 12236016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal stopping analysis of a radiation detection system to protect cities from a nuclear terrorist attack.
Atkinson MP; Cao Z; Wein LM
Risk Anal; 2008 Apr; 28(2):353-71. PubMed ID: 18419654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
