These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19428096)
1. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Seamon LG; Fowler JM; Richardson DL; Carlson MJ; Valmadre S; Phillips GS; Cohn DE Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 19428096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible? Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 120(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21194735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymph node excision--initial experiences and development of a technique]. Schneider A; Krause N; Kühne-Heid R; Kamprath S; Endisch U; Merker A; Nöschel H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(9):498-504. PubMed ID: 8992817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: the console surgeon's perspectives on surgical technique and directing the assistant. Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Richardson DL; Hurt JD; Nickerson EC; Fowler JM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 20226405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. Jung YW; Lee DW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim JH; Kim JW; Kim YT J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 101(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19902479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer. Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience. Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. Benedetti Panici P; Basile S; Maneschi F; Alberto Lissoni A; Signorelli M; Scambia G; Angioli R; Tateo S; Mangili G; Katsaros D; Garozzo G; Campagnutta E; Donadello N; Greggi S; Melpignano M; Raspagliesi F; Ragni N; Cormio G; Grassi R; Franchi M; Giannarelli D; Fossati R; Torri V; Amoroso M; Crocè C; Mangioni C J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Dec; 100(23):1707-16. PubMed ID: 19033573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]