BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1959 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429094)

  • 1. Electrical and magnetic repetitive transcranial stimulation of the primary motor cortex in healthy subjects.
    Gilio F; Iacovelli E; Frasca V; Gabriele M; Giacomelli E; De Lena C; Cipriani AM; Inghilleri M
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 May; 455(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19429094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex.
    Peinemann A; Reimer B; Löer C; Quartarone A; Münchau A; Conrad B; Siebner HR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1519-26. PubMed ID: 15203053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spread of electrical activity at cortical level after repetitive magnetic stimulation in normal subjects.
    Lorenzano C; Gilio F; Inghilleri M; Conte A; Fofi L; Manfredi M; Berardelli A
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12410333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of different stimulation durations.
    Jung SH; Shin JE; Jeong YS; Shin HI
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 119(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 18039593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
    Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Terao Y; Yuasa K; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Altered response to rTMS in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Inghilleri M; Conte A; Frasca V; Scaldaferri N; Gilio F; Santini M; Fabbrini G; Prencipe M; Berardelli A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 16364684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inducing homeostatic-like plasticity in human motor cortex through converging corticocortical inputs.
    Pötter-Nerger M; Fischer S; Mastroeni C; Groppa S; Deuschl G; Volkmann J; Quartarone A; Münchau A; Siebner HR
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3180-90. PubMed ID: 19726723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor cortical excitability studied with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Huntington's disease.
    Lorenzano C; Dinapoli L; Gilio F; Suppa A; Bagnato S; Currà A; Inghilleri M; Berardelli A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1677-81. PubMed ID: 16793338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term and long-term plasticity interaction in human primary motor cortex.
    Iezzi E; Suppa A; Conte A; Li Voti P; Bologna M; Berardelli A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 May; 33(10):1908-15. PubMed ID: 21488986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid-rate paired associative stimulation of the median nerve and motor cortex can produce long-lasting changes in motor cortical excitability in humans.
    Quartarone A; Rizzo V; Bagnato S; Morgante F; Sant'Angelo A; Girlanda P; Siebner HR
    J Physiol; 2006 Sep; 575(Pt 2):657-70. PubMed ID: 16825301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in after-effect between monophasic and biphasic high-frequency rTMS of the human motor cortex.
    Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Mochizuki H; Iwata NK; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 118(10):2227-33. PubMed ID: 17765606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theta-burst stimulation: remote physiological and local behavioral after-effects.
    Stefan K; Gentner R; Zeller D; Dang S; Classen J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):265-74. PubMed ID: 18226550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chronic treatment with rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a study on primary motor cortex excitability tested by 5 Hz-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Trebbastoni A; Gilio F; D'Antonio F; Cambieri C; Ceccanti M; de Lena C; Inghilleri M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 21996001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates motor responses evoked by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Cambieri C; Scelzo E; Li Voti P; Priori A; Accornero N; Inghilleri M
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Aug; 522(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 22732445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repetitive magnetic stimulation of cortical motor areas in Parkinson's disease: implications for the pathophysiology of cortical function.
    Gilio F; Currà A; Inghilleri M; Lorenzano C; Manfredi M; Berardelli A
    Mov Disord; 2002 May; 17(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 12112192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of low-frequency whole-body vibration on motor-evoked potentials in healthy men.
    Mileva KN; Bowtell JL; Kossev AR
    Exp Physiol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 18658234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcranial direct current stimulation preconditioning modulates the effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the human motor cortex.
    Cosentino G; Fierro B; Paladino P; Talamanca S; Vigneri S; Palermo A; Giglia G; Brighina F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 35(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 22211744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of sustained excitability of the leg motor cortex after transcranial magnetic stimulation in associative plasticity.
    Roy FD; Norton JA; Gorassini MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 98(2):657-67. PubMed ID: 17537908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of the effects of repetitive paired transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
    Fitzgerald PB; Fountain S; Hoy K; Maller J; Enticott P; Laycock R; Upton D; Daskalakis ZJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Sep; 165(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 17628691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex.
    Hamada M; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Arai N; Furubayashi T; Inomata-Terada S; Yugeta A; Matsumoto H; Shirota Y; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2672-82. PubMed ID: 17977788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 98.