These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429212)

  • 1. Reaction times identify a Pavlovian component in a two-choice discrimination.
    Blough DS
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 19429212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A random-walk model of accuracy and reaction time applied to three experiments on pigeon visual discrimination.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):133-50. PubMed ID: 21517198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reaction times in discriminations of varying difficulty: decision modulated by arousal.
    Blough DS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 17101238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as propioceptive samples in pigeons.
    García A; Benjumea S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 16903493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention, the presolution period, and choice accuracy in pigeons.
    Chase S; Schupak C; Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2012 Mar; 89(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22138233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral research in pigeons with ARENA: an automated remote environmental navigation apparatus.
    Leising KJ; Garlick D; Parenteau M; Blaisdell AP
    Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 19429204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Less information results in better midsession reversal accuracy by pigeons.
    Zentall TR; Andrews DM; Case JP; Peng DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):422-430. PubMed ID: 31157526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suboptimal criterion setting in a perceptual choice task with asymmetric reinforcement.
    Stüttgen MC; Kasties N; Lengersdorf D; Starosta S; Güntürkün O; Jäkel F
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jun; 96():59-70. PubMed ID: 23466903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction time signatures of discriminative processes: differential effects of stimulus similarity and incentive.
    Blough DS
    Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):157-72. PubMed ID: 15281388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer of hue matching in pigeons.
    Urcuioli PJ; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Sep; 24(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 1206332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of an ambiguous-feature discrimination.
    Haselgrove M; Robinson J; Nelson A; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1710-25. PubMed ID: 18942036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.
    Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jul; 94(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 21279159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When is a choice not a choice? Pigeons fail to inhibit incorrect responses on a go/no-go midsession reversal task.
    McMillan N; Sturdy CB; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 25915749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.
    da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):395-413. PubMed ID: 21119853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distributed versus exclusive preference in discrete-trial choice.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jul; 36(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 20658863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When discrimination fails (or at least falters).
    Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 17044739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective and retrospective timing by pigeons.
    Fetterman JG; Killeen PR
    Learn Behav; 2010 May; 38(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 20400732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.