These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19429215)

  • 21. Conditioned reinforcement dynamics in three-link chained schedules.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 9037785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying transitions in response allocation with change point analysis in concurrent chains.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2014 May; 104():91-8. PubMed ID: 24565979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Choice with initial and terminal link reinforcement: an alternative self-control paradigm.
    Peters HL; Hunt M; Harper DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 14709117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sensitivity to delay is affected by magnitude of reinforcement in rats.
    Orduña V; Valencia-Torres L; Cruz G; Bouzas A
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():18-24. PubMed ID: 23624099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.
    Ploog BO
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 11516116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
    Spetch ML; Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 3559459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 10966097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.
    Dunn R; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 2324663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The relation between resistance to change and preference in pigeons with concurrent chained schedules].
    Igaki T; Sakagami T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2001 Jun; 72(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 11544912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Observing of chain-schedule stimuli.
    Slezak JM; Anderson KG
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jun; 105():19-27. PubMed ID: 24582929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Choice between contingencies of variation: effects of the requirement of variation upon preference.
    Pontes TN; Abreu-Rodrigues J; Souza AS
    Behav Processes; 2012 Nov; 91(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 22960371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of reinforcement context on choice.
    Jacob TC; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 May; 49(3):367-81. PubMed ID: 3385353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.
    Killeen P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 5660707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Resistance to change of operant variation and repetition.
    Doughty AH; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Sep; 76(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 11599639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acquisition of choice in concurrent chains: Assessing the cumulative decision model.
    Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():82-93. PubMed ID: 27005579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Companion's effects upon resistance to change.
    dos Santos CV; Abreu-Rodrigues J
    Behav Processes; 2008 Oct; 79(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 18632224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.